From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com   
      
   On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 9:11:05 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:   
   < the usual nonsense >   
      
   Here's a bulletin for you Hank:   
      
   At 5 % correct answers, you don't know shit.   
      
   I posted 5 questions at a time and gave you idiots 5 days to answer them,   
   plenty of time to look up the answers and reply.   
   And in spite of all that flexibility, you could only respond to 6 questions   
   out of 40.   
      
   When you can't outscore morons like Bud and Corbett on a simple test, you   
   don't know shit.   
   One correct answer out of 19 might be borderline genius for WC supporters in   
   your world, but in the real world it sucks.   
   You couldn't even answer simple "yes" or "no" questions.   
   You ran like a little bieotch from 34 of the 40 questions and most of your   
   responses weren't given until the questions were closed.   
      
   Your problem is that you depend in your arguments too much on testimony you   
   copy and paste from the St John of McAdams website.    
   Warren Commission testimony that has been shown at times to be less than   
   truthful.   
   Like the testimony that Oswald had no access to sensitive material while he   
   worked at Jaggers-Childs-Stovall, testimony that conflicts with the record.   
   A record that indicates Graef and Stovall lied about Oswald's access to   
   sensitive work done for the US Army Map Service.   
      
   Anyway, we tested your knowledge and found out the truth.    
   You're not "more knowedgeable" than anybody.    
   In fact, you're not much smarter than Corbett and way dumber than Bud.   
      
   So go sit in the corner with your dunce cap on and lick your wounds, Hank.   
   And admit it, you were beaten for this year's "MACKEY" award by two idiots.   
      
   Congratulations on your THIRD place finish.   
   Better luck next year.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)