From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Friday, November 3, 2023 at 1:32:26 AM UTC-4, Donald Willis wrote:   
   > 1:22pm DPD radio message translates as The Jacket Was Planted, Folks--and   
   that ain't all    
   >    
   > First faint clue:  DPD Sgt. G.D. Henslee transcribes the first line of the   
   transmission thusly:  "Have a description of the suspect on Jefferson."    
   Actually, the transmission runs, "We have a description on this suspect over   
   here on Jefferson."  The    
   omitted "over here" makes it sound like the sender, Officer Roy Walker, is   
   actually on Jefferson. Is there a problem with that?  Oh, yes.    
   >      
   > Second faint clue:  But, first, continuing the text of the 1:22   
   transmission:  "Last seen about 300 E. Jefferson.  He's a white male, about   
   30, 5'8", black hair, slender, wearing a white jacket, white shirt, and dark   
   slacks". (DPD radio logs)  Dale    
   Myers tinkers with the description:  "Last seen about 300 block of East   
   Jefferson." ("With Malice" p114)  Note that he adds "block of", making it   
   sound as if Walker is simply indicating a block.  But Walker specified an   
   address, 300, at Jefferson &    
   Beckley, a full block west of the site where the jacket was found, at   
   Jefferson & Crawford.  And if it be thought that dictabelt skips account for   
   the missing words, see below for follow-ups on Myers and Walker.  And note   
   that the dispatcher, at 1:26,    
   has the suspect "going west on Jefferson from the 300 block". (CE 705 p22)    
   >    
   > Third faint clue:  At 1:19:05, the dispatcher tells Walker to check out 501   
   E. 10th at Denver (WMp105).  Then, at 1:19:59, he tells Walker "The suspect's   
   running west on Jefferson from the location" (DPD radio logs/WMp109).  When,   
   at 1:21:37, Walker    
   radios "I haven't seen anything on Jefferson yet" (DPD radio logs), the   
   dispatcher again directs him to "501 E. 10th at Denver" (CE 705p20/WM p113).    
   Finally, at 1:22:36, Walker radios his "over here" description.  From his   
   1:21:37 transmission, we know    
   that Walker was, at the time, on Jefferson.  But we don't know, from his radio   
   transmissions, whether he was ever at 10th & Patton.  He doesn't correct or   
   follow-up the dispatcher's "10th at Denver", after either of the latter's   
   advisories.    
   >    
   > Fourth (getting somewhere) clue:  And yet Myers insists that Walker met and   
   talked to Warren Reynolds at the murder scene:  "Reynolds returned to 10th &   
   Patton at about [1:20], despite Reynolds' testimony to the contrary" (p112).    
   True, in 1983, Walker    
   told Myers that he did meet Reynolds, about 1:22.  However, he adds, "One of   
   the used car lot operators saw the incident... Warren Reynolds" (p114).  The   
   latter never said that he saw the shooting--Walker's memory fails him here.    
   >    
   > And Reynolds would hardly have been the one to tell Walker, "Last seen about   
   300 E. Jefferson".  Ruinously for him, Walker told Myers that it was "Reynolds   
   [who] gave me the description of the gunman" (p114).  Walker was apparently   
   unaware that TV film    
   footage has turned up showing Reynolds telling police at the scene that he   
   last saw a suspicious man going into the back of an old house near the Texaco   
   station (WM p131).  Reynolds, then, could not have been Walker's "300 E.   
   Jefferson" witness, a full    
   block west of the house.  (Reynolds' suspicious man may not have been the   
   gunman at all, but a vigilante trailing the gunman.)  Myers, then, with one   
   hand, was simply extending Walker's witness-identity deception, despite his   
   own text and frame grabs    
   which, with the other hand, expose said deception!  Myers giveth and Myers   
   taketh away.    
   >    
   > Fifth (gathering steam) clue:  Myers then buttresses the invented   
   Walker/Reynolds confab with yet another out-of-thin-air incident, based on the   
   word of... no one at all:  "Warren Reynolds, who had come with [Sgt. Bud Owens   
   & Assistant DA Bill    
   Alexander] from 10th & Patton, pointed to an old house near the Texaco   
   station..." (p120)  Alexander did not testify to the Warren Commission, and   
   Owens, in his Commission testimony, did not mention bringing along a witness   
   to the Texaco area.  None of    
   the principals, then--Reynolds, Walker, Alexander, Owens--can support Myers'   
   vignettes re Reynolds "returning" to and leaving the scene of the crime circa   
   1:20 and 1:22.  Thin air.    
   >    
   > Sixth (Eureka!) clue:  Relocation, relocation, relocation.  Why would Walker   
   and Myers go to so much trouble to falsely identify and relocate a witness?    
   Well, what other witness or witnesses were "over here on Jefferson"?    
   Yes--Robert and Mary Brock,    
   in effect the gatekeepers of the parking-lot suspect.  In fact, the Brocks   
   were the only witnesses who stated that they "last observed [the suspect] in   
   the parking lot directly behind" the service station. (WM p551)  In fact, they   
   may have been the last    
   witnesses to have reported seeing the suspect, but not in the parking lot, and   
   certainly not doffing his jacket.  Because at 1:22, he was reported at "about   
   300 E. Jefferson", a block further west, still wearing his "white jacket".    
   Certainly worth    
   Walker's false identification of his witness, and Myers' subsequent, false   
   relocation of him elsewhere.  Two wrongs and no right.    
   >       
   > And the first transmissions re the Texaco location were "Suspect just passed   
   401 E. Jefferson" and "Subject just passed 401 E. Jefferson" (CE 705pp20-21)    
   >    
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)