From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com   
      
   On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 9:35:02 PM UTC-5, Donald Willis wrote:   
   > The finding of the hulls in Oak Cliff was compromised by the fact that it   
   took some 4 months for Benavides to come around and say that he found them on   
   the Davis lawn, when they were apparently found a block away. If the location   
   was wrong, perhaps the    
   hulls themselves were the wrong ones.    
   >    
   > dcw   
      
   Those shells ( hulls ) had NOTHING to do with the Tippit murder.   
   Were they fired from the handgun ?    
   Absolutely.    
   But there's no evidence that they were fired at 10th and Patton.   
      
   1. There's no chain of custody form for the shells.   
      
   2. The witnesses who found the shells could not identify the shells in   
   evidence as the shells they found. ( CE 2011 / 24 H 415-416 )   
      
   3. At least two of the shells in evidence have markings on them that were not   
   consistent with anyone known to be in the chain of custody. ( DPD Box 7, pg.   
   478 )   
      
   4. Off. J.M.Poe, who told the FBI he marked the two shells he got from Domingo   
   Benavides, before giving them to Sgt. Barnes,  ( CE 2011 / 24 H 415-416 )   
   could not find his mark on any of the shells when asked to do so. During his   
   testimony, he chose the    
   wrong shells ( both Westerns, Q-75 & Q-77 ) as the ones he marked. ( 7 H 69 )    
   One of those Western shells ( Q-75 ), was identified as having been found by   
   Virginia Davis. ( CE 2011 / 24 H 415 )   
   Shell Q-75 could not have been found by BOTH Virginia Davis AND Benavides.   
      
   5. The shells in evidence do not match the bullets recovered from Tippit's   
   body. ( 3 H 465 )   
      
   6. The shells were not turned over to the FBI until November 28, 1963. ( DPD   
   Box 7, pg. 478 )   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)