From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 1:23:01 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:   
   > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:59:57 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus    
   >  wrote:    
   >    
   > >On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:45:54?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > >> On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:38:08?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > >> > What I get a big laugh out of is the fact that we keep doing what they    
   > >> > can't do... I post evidential questions (as do you) that they can't    
   > >> > answer... and they can't do the same... I refute well-known authors    
   > >> > such as Bugliosi - and believers can't do the same.    
   > >> And you know you have them by the balls when they resort to insults, like   
   Chuckles, or semantics, like Chickenshit.    
   > >> Chickenshit must have been a great kid. Imagine if his parents told him   
   "NO" ?    
   > >> Response: "What do you mean by No" ?    
   > >> I'm like you, I just sit there and laugh.    
   > >> The more vicious the name-calling, the more they tell me I'm winning the   
   debate.    
   > >> ROFLMAO    
   > >    
   > >I would say that you hit the nail on the head.    
   > >The questions exposed the dishonesty of the Warren Commission "believers"   
   who responded, and the cowardice of those who didn't.   
   > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:59:57 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus    
   >  wrote:    
   >    
   > >On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:45:54?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > >> On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:38:08?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > >>> What I get a big laugh out of is the fact that we keep doing what they    
   > >>> can't do... I post evidential questions (as do you) that they can't    
   > >>> answer... and they can't do the same... I refute well-known authors    
   > >>> such as Bugliosi - and believers can't do the same.    
   > >>    
   > >> And you know you have them by the balls when they resort to insults, like   
   Chuckles, or semantics, like Chickenshit.    
   > >> Chickenshit must have been a great kid. Imagine if his parents told him   
   "NO" ?    
   > >> Response: "What do you mean by No" ?    
   > >> I'm like you, I just sit there and laugh.    
   > >> The more vicious the name-calling, the more they tell me I'm winning the   
   debate.    
   > >> ROFLMAO    
   > >    
   > >I would say that you hit the nail on the head.    
   > >The questions exposed the dishonesty of the Warren Commission "believers"   
   who responded, and the cowardice of those who didn't.   
   > Au contraire!!! Just because they answer - DOESN'T MEAN THEY AREN'T    
   > COWARDS!    
   >    
   > Many, if not most of the questions you asked - THEY KNOW THE CORRECT    
   > ANSWER.    
   >    
   > They just refuse to give it.    
   >    
   > For example, Huckster Sienzant knows beyond any doubt that the    
   > prosectors never dissected the throat wound - BUT HE'S A COWARD WHO    
   > CANNOT *SAY* THAT.   
      
     You refuse to show that they didn`t.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)