From: 19efppp@mail.com   
      
   On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 1:47:03 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:   
   > It looks like your questions have been answered, but none of them have been   
   answered TO YOUR SATISFACTION, correct? Some of the answers are snarky, some   
   of the answers are detailed, with links to WC testimony, but no doubt the   
   answers are not to your    
   satisfaction.    
   >    
   > Let's start with the basic understanding that there are no answers to your   
   hobby point gotchas which will ever satisfy you.    
   >    
   > I can answer all of your hobby point gotchas quite easily, but they won't be   
   answered to your satisfaction because YOU are the director, producer, actor,   
   ticket taker, script writer, projectionist, concession stand operator, etc.   
   for your very own JFK    
   conspiracy drama production, and to answer the questions to your satisfaction   
   puts the director, producer, actor, ticket taker, script writer,   
   projectionist, concession stand operator, etc. of business, and let's face it:   
   you're not going to put yourself    
   out of business.    
   >    
   > Anyways, here are the answers to your hobby points that you're going to get   
   from me. I'm not going to answer you as you demand, but that's tough luck for   
   you.    
   >    
   > ALL of your questions revolve around a few things, repeated ad nauseam by   
   you and your fellow JFK conspiracy hobbyists over the decades.    
   >    
   > 1.) Your questions are begged. You embed assumptions that haven't been   
   established into the questions.    
   > 2.) Your questions are based on trivia. Concerning Oswald's jacket, what   
   would it matter about where he purchased it or if he got it used or found it   
   somewhere?    
   > 3.) Your questions revolve around what conspiracy-smasher Jay Utah at the   
   International Skeptics Forum calls a "Fringe Reset," which refers to the   
   constant repetition by JFK conspiracy hobbyists of questions and charges that   
   have been addressed    
   ENDLESSLY (although as I noted, not addressed to your satisfaction) and   
   re-presented over and over, decade after decade, as if the questions are fresh   
   or new. They're not. You RESET the argument from the FRINGE.    
   > 4.) Your questions are straw man arguments.    
   > 5.) Your questions shift the burden. Research your own questions and present   
   your findings and your critics will weigh in. Have you ever reached out to any   
   1960s era retired Dallas cops to ask about those evidence forms? No? Ask   
   yourself why you are    
   this lazy if this is a question so important to you. Work. Pick up a phone.   
   Write an email.    
   >    
   > There are more logical fallacies you use when constructing your hobby   
   points, but those are the main ones I see. If you want better answers, ask   
   better questions. To ask better questions, remove the fallacies I noted above.    
   >    
   > I have now answered all of your question in one fell swoop and with just a   
   few paragraphs. Did I answer them individually as you wished? No. Did you   
   learn anything? No. Did I answer any of them TO YOUR SATISFACTION? No. That's   
   because no answers will    
   ever satisfy you. Ever.    
   >    
   > You asked, I answered. But not to your satisfaction.    
   >    
   > Now what? Shelve the questions and haul them out a few days/weeks/months   
   later?   
   Nutter Hobbyist Chucky the Schu is never satisfied with any explanation which   
   does not confirm his bias, so naturally he sits back in his easy chair and   
   accuses others of having his own faults. That's why everybody knows him as The   
   Lazy Ass Nutter    
   Hypocrite.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)