From: chuckschuyler123@gmail.com   
      
   On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 10:11:20 AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:   
      
   > On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 10:58:49 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:    
      
   > > Hank answered it, BUT NOT TO YOUR SATISFACTION. Don't lie and say it   
   wasn't answered. It was answered.   
      
      
   > Hank answered the question at 9:33 am this morning,    
      
   So I was correct. Thank you.   
      
   >8 hours AFTER you said the questions were all answered.    
      
   Except I didn't write that. I wrote it LOOKS like all of your questions were   
   answered, and if your beef is that ONE wasn't answered (to your satisfaction)   
   before I answered all of them in one fell swoop, your fallacy is the fallacy   
   of the never ending    
   nit-pick. Let's remember that regardless as to when ANY of the questions   
   are/were answered, none of the answers provided will ever be acceptable to   
   you, so WHEN they were answered is moot.   
      
   > When you made the statement at 1:47 am this morning, no one had yet   
   responded to that question.    
      
   I did.   
      
   > When I pointed out your lie at 5:30 am this morning, no one had yet   
   responded to that question.    
      
   I did. I answered all of them at 12:47am my time, 1:47am your time, so using   
   YOUR standards, you just lied. I answered them, and as I predicted, the   
   answers DIDN'T MEET YOUR STANDARDS, surprise, surprise.   
   >    
   > That makes your original post a lie and you a goddamned liar.   
      
   Nah.    
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)