From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 4:31:19 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:   
   > On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 11:11:20 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > > On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 10:58:49 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler   
   wrote:    
   > > > Hank answered it, BUT NOT TO YOUR SATISFACTION. Don't lie and say it   
   wasn't answered. It was answered.    
   > > Hank answered the question at 9:33 am this morning, 8 hours AFTER you said   
   the questions were all answered.   
   > He answered it before I did. Here it is again:    
   > “1.) Your questions are begged. You embed assumptions that haven't been   
   established into the questions.”    
   >    
   > I responded later with essentially the same answer:    
   > “Absurd begged Question logical fallacy. … Your imbedded assumption is   
   he built that bag using only his left index finger and right palm. Why do you   
   assume he used only his left index finger and right palm?”   
      
      And this is really the correct way to answer when someone poses a   
   fallacious question, you point out the fallacious nature of the question.   
      
     Corbett addressed the implications inherent in the questions, which he   
   quickly saw was a mistake, because Gil merely denied the implications. I gave   
   simple answers that ignored the implications imbedded in the questions, which   
   upset Gil, as it avoids    
   the crooked game he had set up. But the correct way is to point out that the   
   questions are flawed, and need to be fixed before they can be answered.   
      
   > > When you made the statement at 1:47 am this morning, no one had yet   
   responded to that question.   
   > He had: “I have now answered all of your question in one fell swoop and   
   with just a few paragraphs. Did I answer them individually as you wished? No.   
   Did you learn anything? No. Did I answer any of them TO YOUR SATISFACTION? No.   
   That's because no    
   answers will ever satisfy you. Ever.”   
   > > When I pointed out your lie at 5:30 am this morning, no one had yet   
   responded to that question.    
   > >    
   > > That makes your original post a lie and you a goddamned liar.   
   > He responded. You just don’t accept his answer.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)