home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.jfk      Discussing the assassination of JFK      99,700 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 97,962 of 99,700   
   Chuck Schuyler to Gil Jesus   
   Re: A Question for the Lone Nutters on t   
   09 Nov 23 12:34:22   
   
   From: chuckschuyler123@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 10:09:24 AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 10:39:26 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > > No moron, it's never "shifting the burden" to ask someone to support    
   > > what they believe. It's ALWAYS your burden to support what you    
   > > believe.    
   > >    
   > > You basicly deny having ANY BURDEN AT ALL. And that's simply    
   > > cowardice.   
      
   > Absolutely.    
      
   Says the guys who refuse to tell us what they think happened that day.   
      
   >That's one asshole who refuses to answer the question.    
      
   Except I did, asshole. You don't like my answers.   
      
      
   > If he had already answered it, he should have no problem repeating that   
   answer.    
   > A simple copy-and-paste would to the trick.    
      
   Shifting the burden. Fringe reset. Trivia.   
      
      
   > But he continues to duck and dodge the question instead.    
      
   Except I don't.   
   >    
   > There are ways to show if those shells were fired at 10th and Patton.    
   > Acting as a proxy for the Warren Commission, I asked him to see his   
   evidence.    
      
   I am specifically NOT standing in as a proxy for the WC. That's your desire.   
   You want me to stand in by proxy for the WC so you can bounce your speculative   
   hobby point nit-picks off of me and have me play Fetch the Stick. Not doing it.   
      
   > He refuses to show it, claiming he has no burden to do so.    
      
   I have no burden to re-investigate a case I feel was already handled   
   correctly.    
   >    
   > He has a burden to PROVE what he says is true and what he supports ( the   
   Warren Commission case ).    
      
   Wrong. I'm here to read your JFK conspiracy story. When will you be presenting   
   it?   
      
   > By refusing to show his evidence, he proves that he cannot defend the very   
   "evidence" he supports.    
      
   I have no evidence nor burden to defend anything. I may choose to do so at   
   certain times, but I have no burden to do so. I was two years old when JFK was   
   killed. It was already investigated and concluded before I was in school.   
   >    
   > Yes, he's a coward AND a liar.    
   > A real LOSER.    
   > Beware. He's probably got some land in Florida he'll sell you.    
   > ROFLMAO   
      
   How about a truck with a bad transmission, chump?   
      
   Keep entertaining us Fish Part. You're doing a great job.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca