Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 97,962 of 99,700    |
|    Chuck Schuyler to Gil Jesus    |
|    Re: A Question for the Lone Nutters on t    |
|    09 Nov 23 12:34:22    |
      From: chuckschuyler123@gmail.com              On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 10:09:24 AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:       > On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 10:39:26 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:        > > No moron, it's never "shifting the burden" to ask someone to support        > > what they believe. It's ALWAYS your burden to support what you        > > believe.        > >        > > You basicly deny having ANY BURDEN AT ALL. And that's simply        > > cowardice.              > Absolutely.               Says the guys who refuse to tell us what they think happened that day.              >That's one asshole who refuses to answer the question.               Except I did, asshole. You don't like my answers.                     > If he had already answered it, he should have no problem repeating that       answer.        > A simple copy-and-paste would to the trick.               Shifting the burden. Fringe reset. Trivia.                     > But he continues to duck and dodge the question instead.               Except I don't.       >        > There are ways to show if those shells were fired at 10th and Patton.        > Acting as a proxy for the Warren Commission, I asked him to see his       evidence.               I am specifically NOT standing in as a proxy for the WC. That's your desire.       You want me to stand in by proxy for the WC so you can bounce your speculative       hobby point nit-picks off of me and have me play Fetch the Stick. Not doing it.              > He refuses to show it, claiming he has no burden to do so.               I have no burden to re-investigate a case I feel was already handled       correctly.        >        > He has a burden to PROVE what he says is true and what he supports ( the       Warren Commission case ).               Wrong. I'm here to read your JFK conspiracy story. When will you be presenting       it?              > By refusing to show his evidence, he proves that he cannot defend the very       "evidence" he supports.               I have no evidence nor burden to defend anything. I may choose to do so at       certain times, but I have no burden to do so. I was two years old when JFK was       killed. It was already investigated and concluded before I was in school.       >        > Yes, he's a coward AND a liar.        > A real LOSER.        > Beware. He's probably got some land in Florida he'll sell you.        > ROFLMAO              How about a truck with a bad transmission, chump?              Keep entertaining us Fish Part. You're doing a great job.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca