From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 9:20:55 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:   
   >    
   > You need to provide the evidence the evidence is not legit, not just assume   
   it and ask us to prove otherwise.    
      
   LOL...I'm sorry, I thought in America it was the burden of the prosecution to   
   prove its case and part of that    
   involved proving the evidence is authentic.   
      
   Let me ask you this, Hank:   
      
   Was any chain-of-custody forms were ever filled out for the shells currently   
   in evidence ?   
      
   Were the shells photographed as found, being that there were police   
   photographers present at the scene ?   
      
   Did the persons who found the shells identify the shells currently in evidence   
   as the shells they found ?   
      
   Did the police officer who marked two shells given to him identify ANY of the   
   shells currently in evidence as the shells he marked ?    
      
   Whose Initials appear on two of the shells that do not correspond to anyone   
   known to have been in the chain of custody ?   
      
   Do the shells match in number and manufacturer the bullets that were removed   
   from Off. Tippit’s body ?   
      
   Were the shells originally identified by police as .38 specials ?   
      
   Do the shells contain corrosion consistent with having been in a gunbelt or a   
   bullet slide ?   
      
   It's all here for you and your asshole pals to cry about:   
      
   https://gil-jesus.com/the-tippit-shells/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)