From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 5:17:54 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 9:20:55 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > >   
   > > You need to provide the evidence the evidence is not legit, not just   
   assume it and ask us to prove otherwise.   
   > LOL...I'm sorry, I thought in America it was the burden of the prosecution   
   to prove its case and part of that    
   > involved proving the evidence is authentic.    
      
     What reason is there to believe they are not? If you think there is a   
   problem with the evidence it is up to you to make a positive argument showing   
   this.   
      
     It has been explained to you over and over that there was no trial, so there   
   was no prosecution. You are too stupid to understand this so you repeat the   
   claim over and over.   
       
   > Let me ask you this, Hank:    
   >    
   > Was any chain-of-custody forms were ever filled out for the shells currently   
   in evidence ?    
      
     You refuse to show this is necessary.   
       
   > Were the shells photographed as found, being that there were police   
   photographers present at the scene ?    
      
      You refuse to show this is necessary.   
      
   > Did the persons who found the shells identify the shells currently in   
   evidence as the shells they found ?    
      
      You refuse to show this is necessary.   
      
   > Did the police officer who marked two shells given to him identify ANY of   
   the shells currently in evidence as the shells he marked ?    
      
     Where they the only marks?    
      
     Didn`t the crime scene specialist at the scene take control of the evidence?   
       
   > Whose Initials appear on two of the shells that do not correspond to anyone   
   known to have been in the chain of custody ?    
      
     You refuse to show this is true.   
       
   > Do the shells match in number and manufacturer the bullets that were removed   
   from Off. Tippit’s body ?    
      
     You refuse to show this is necessary.   
       
   > Were the shells originally identified by police as .38 specials ?    
      
     You refuse to show this is significant.   
       
   > Do the shells contain corrosion consistent with having been in a gunbelt or   
   a bullet slide ?    
      
     You refuse to show this is true.   
      
   > It's all here for you and your asshole pals to cry about:    
      
     A buffet of nothingburgers.   
       
   > https://gil-jesus.com/the-tippit-shells/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)