From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 4:31:19 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:   
   > On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 11:11:20 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > > On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 10:58:49 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler   
   wrote:    
   > > > Hank answered it, BUT NOT TO YOUR SATISFACTION. Don't lie and say it   
   wasn't answered. It was answered.    
   > > Hank answered the question at 9:33 am this morning, 8 hours AFTER you said   
   the questions were all answered.   
   > He answered it before I did. Here it is again:    
   > “1.) Your questions are begged. You embed assumptions that haven't been   
   established into the questions.”    
   >    
   > I responded later with essentially the same answer:    
   > “Absurd begged Question logical fallacy. … Your imbedded assumption is   
   he built that bag using only his left index finger and right palm. Why do you   
   assume he used only his left index finger and right palm?”   
   > > When you made the statement at 1:47 am this morning, no one had yet   
   responded to that question.   
   > He had: “I have now answered all of your question in one fell swoop and   
   with just a few paragraphs. Did I answer them individually as you wished? No.   
   Did you learn anything? No. Did I answer any of them TO YOUR SATISFACTION? No.   
   That's because no    
   answers will ever satisfy you. Ever.”   
   > > When I pointed out your lie at 5:30 am this morning, no one had yet   
   responded to that question.    
   > >    
   > > That makes your original post a lie and you a goddamned liar.   
   > He responded. You just don’t accept his answer.   
      
   Gil has ducked out of the discussion thread once more. He raises an issue,   
   rejects the answers, and then avoids having a discussion about the issue he   
   raised.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)