From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Tuesday, November 14, 2023 at 12:50:32 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:   
   > On Monday, November 13, 2023 at 10:38:35 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 1:40:42 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:    
   > > > On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 10:04:30 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > > > > On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 18:10:25 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant    
   > > > >  wrote:    
   > > > >    
   > > > > You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the    
   > > > > description of the *location* of the large head wound.    
   > > > >    
   > > > > Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding    
   > > > > paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?    
   > > > >    
   > > > > You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.    
   > > > >    
   > > > > Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?    
   > > > >    
   > > > > Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?    
   > > > >    
   > > > > Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,    
   > > > > and exited the back of his head.    
   > > > >    
   > > > > More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.    
   > > > >    
   > > > > Are you proud of yourself?    
   > > > > Huckster?    
   > > > Ben the Irrelevant Troll?    
   > > Pretty much at this point.    
   > >    
   > > If you remember Anthony Marsh, towards the end of his posting life his   
   posts often made little sense. Some suspected mental impairment of some sort.   
   Perhaps that is happening here with Ben. He fervently believes in a   
   conspiracy, we've known that for    
   a long time. Perhaps he has some condition that prevents him from voicing his   
   concerns in the manner that he can be understood, so he is reduced to doing   
   the best he can with the faculties he has left.    
   > >    
   > > If true, it is sad. No one wants Ben to enunciate his concerns more   
   clearly than I, to form articulate well-reasoned responses complete with   
   citations to the evidence, but it appears he is not capable of doing so, based   
   on his last month or two of    
   repeating the same two posts, or appending those same two posts to brief   
   comments.    
   > >    
   > > Ben to call me a liar and a coward, and repeat his false claims about   
   things I never said.   
   > Here Hank projects his own dementia onto others. Before you know it he'll be   
   voting for Donald Trump.   
      
    I pointed out the evidence leading me to that conclusion (his apparent   
   inability to post anything but the same one post to me, and the same one post   
   to Bud) and I qualified it with, “if true”.   
   It's neither dementia nor ad hominem.    
      
   Case in point: see the response from Ben immediately above this.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)