From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 1:05:14 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:   
   > On Tuesday, November 14, 2023 at 2:18:59 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > > On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:59:14 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant    
   > >  wrote:    
   > >    
   > >    
   > > Your arguments are uncited and unproven. Indeed, you REFUSE to support    
   > > 'em:    
   > > You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the    
   > > description of the *location* of the large head wound.    
   > >    
   > > Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding    
   > > paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?    
   > >    
   > > You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.    
   > >    
   > > Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?    
   > >    
   > > Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?    
   > >    
   > > Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,    
   > > and exited the back of his head.    
   > >    
   > > More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.    
   > >    
   > > Are you proud of yourself?   
   > Donald Willis has more to say:    
   >    
   > Donald Willis    
   > Posted 7 hours ago    
   >    
   > Update: Meanwhile, back at alt.conspiracy.jfk,    
      
    Talk about running to your safe space.   
      
   >Hank S is putting words in my mouth, which he can easily get away with since   
   Google won't let me post there now. He says I "won't post [there] anymore". As   
   NTFH noted, at acj, I can't post there any more. (I was told by Google to find   
   a "code" in my    
   email in-box, but the same page that told me that also froze me on that page,   
   without access to my in-box or new tabs!)    
   >    
   > I noticed that, too. Hank has been at least implying that Willis does not   
   want to post here, when Willis has been clearly saying that he is not being   
   allowed to post here despite his desire. Of course, Hank used such wording as   
   to allow for his escape    
   from this charge, being the slithering snake he is. This illustrates the   
   underhanded way in which Hank insults people.    
   >    
   > As for Willis' Google problem, I have no idea what he's talking about.   
   Google has never done this to me. Perhaps Willis is their test case for a new   
   censorship technique. We live in exciting times!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)