From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 10:10:33 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:   
   > Consilience.    
   >    
   > Do you understand what consilience is?    
      
     No, Gil has no understanding, nor any interest in "consilience". It is like   
   "parsimony", these are tools used in reasoning in order to get to the truth of   
   matters. It is of no use to Gil (or Ben), as they have no real interest in   
   getting to the truth,    
   only to play silly games with the deaths of these men.   
      
   > In history, it is the principle that evidence from independent, unrelated   
   sources can "converge" on strong conclusions.    
   >    
   > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consilience#:~:text=In%20science   
   20and%20history%2C%20consilience,%22converge%22%20on%20strong%20conclusions.    
   >    
   > Why is there so much consilience in the evidence that points towards Oswald   
   as the assassin on 11/22/63, and why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent,   
   unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions? All Team Oswald can   
   agree on is that a vague    
   conspiracy of some sort killed JFK. You guys can't agree if Oswald was the   
   shooter, or how many shots were fired or whether JFK's body/coffin was   
   hijacked for a secret autopsy, or whether the Zapruder film was altered, and   
   on and on.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)