From: willisdonald824@gmail.com   
      
   On Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 6:38:58 AM UTC-8, Hank Sienzant wrote:   
   > > Donald Willis has more to say:    
   > >    
   > > Donald Willis    
   > > Posted 7 hours ago    
   > >    
   > > Update: Meanwhile, back at alt.conspiracy.jfk, Hank S is putting words in   
   my mouth, which he can easily get away with since Google won't let me post   
   there now. He says I "won't post [there] anymore". As NTFH noted, at acj, I   
   can't post there any more.   
    (I was told by Google to find a "code" in my email in-box, but the same page   
   that told me that also froze me on that page, without access to my in-box or   
   new tabs!)    
   > >    
   > > I noticed that, too. Hank has been at least implying that Willis does not   
   want to post here, when Willis has been clearly saying that he is not being   
   allowed to post here despite his desire.   
   > Did you verify Don’s claims independently? Me neither.    
   >    
   > I will not debate Willis with you acting as an intermediary.   
   > > Of course, Hank used such wording as to allow for his escape from this   
   charge, being the slithering snake he is. This illustrates the underhanded way   
   in which Hank insults people.   
   > Hilarious! As opposed to the overhanded way you come right out and call me a   
   slithering snake, right?    
   >    
   > All I know is I'm still here, and he is not. I said exactly that. I am not   
   going to chase Willis around from forum to forum. He can post and call me a   
   liar wherever he wishes. You and Ben can do that, too.    
   >    
   > Oh, wait, you already do!   
   > >    
   > > As for Willis' Google problem, I have no idea what he's talking about.   
   Google has never done this to me.   
   > Whenever I asked Don for a link to establish his claim, he would always beg   
   off, saying he couldn't figure out how to copy and paste links. If true, then   
   Don does not appear to be the most computer-literate person around. So would   
   it be possible his    
   inability to post using Google is of his own doing?   
      
   Snark, snark, snark!  Notice that Corbett and BT George had the same problem,    
   Joe.   
      
   > > Perhaps Willis is their test case for a new censorship technique. We live   
   in exciting times!   
   > That's the logical fallacy of a false dichotomy. Another option is maybe   
   you're just a little too paranoid. Given you're a conspiracy theorist, which   
   option do you think is more likely?    
   > A. Google conspiring against Don, or    
   > B. Don screwing something up?    
   >    
   > Can you tell us why you failed to consider or even list the more reasonable   
   viewpoint?    
   >    
   > John McAdams' website listed multiple different ways to read a   
   t.assassination.JFK. Those ways would also apply to alt.conspiracy.JFK.    
   >    
   > Perhaps Don should explore alternate means of accessing the forum beyond   
   Google.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)