From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com   
      
   On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 8:26:29 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:   
   > Asking for your opinion or take on the matter. Feel free to define it or   
   interpret it as you may.    
      
   "Historically guilty" makes no sense. That's why you can't post the link that   
   defines it. There's no such thing. It's a phrase you made up.   
   A phrase you made up out of ignorance, because history cannot determine a   
   person's guilt or innocence. Neither can the media. In America, only a judge   
   or jury can do that.   
   And because Oswald was never TRIED, he is therefore entitled to a presumption   
   of innocence under the 5th, 6th and 14th Amendments to the US Constitution.   
   While cementheads like yourself would label him an "assassin", the fact is   
   that he was the ACCUSED assassin of the President and Tippit.   
   The fact that they had evidence against him is meaningless, because that   
   evidence was never challenged in court.   
   But I challenege it on my site:   
   www.gil-jesus.com   
      
   Now, if you're asking me if the Warren Commission concluded that Oswald killed   
   Kennedy, then the answer is yes.    
   That's what they concluded.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)