From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 5:02:44 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 2:49:15 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:    
   > > What did you mean when you wrote that history and the mainstream media   
   will always regard Oswald as JFK's assassin? You wrote it at your website.    
   > >    
   > > Isn't that the same as "historically guilty," which you're giving me a   
   hard time about?   
   > No, it's not. You didn't tell the whole story.    
   >    
   > From my website:    
   > "Perhaps the greatest injustice of all is that because of that shoddy   
   investigation, history and the Mainstream Media will always refer to Oswald as   
   the assassin of President Kennedy, instead of the ACCUSED assassin."    
   >    
   > It's a comparison between the misidentification of Oswald as the assassin   
   and the technically correct label of ACCUSED assassin.    
   > It says nothing about "historically guilty".    
   >    
   > Stupid.   
      
   So you think history books should refer to John Wilkes Booth as the accused   
   assassin of Lincoln. Or maybe you think even    
   that goes to far since he was killed before being formally charged.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)