From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com   
      
   On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 2:27:33 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:   
   > It really doesn't mean anything other than the Official Story is that a   
   person is guilty. Of course, the Nutter Retards are going to believe the   
   Official Story verdict, but that's all it is. The rulers say Oswald did it.    
   > Everybody knows that.   
      
   The term "historically guilty" is the brainchild of a pompous ass named   
   Charles "Chuck" Schuyler. Since Oswald was never convicted of either murder,   
   he needed to have something to hang his "Oswald-did-it" hat on to. And the   
   fact that the idiot can invent    
   a phrase that incorporates the word "guilty" is a big plus for them. But of   
   course, like the case itself, the prhase makes zero sense. History cannot   
   determine the innocence or guilt of an individual. Only a judge or a jury can   
   do that.   
      
   It's nonsense, which is why it makes all the sense in the world to jackasses   
   like Corbett and Bud.   
      
   And they try to make vain arguments to support this nonsense like comparing   
   Oswald to Hitler. Hitler, they note, was also never tried, so does that mean   
   he wasn't responsible for the killing of 6 million Jews ?   
   But they fail to mention that the Nuremberg War Trials exposed the level of   
   Hitler's involvement in the Holocaust.    
      
   The Lone Nut Trolls always fail. My 40 questions exposed just how little they   
   know of the case.    
      
   Like the FBI and the military experts who fired the CE 139 rifle, in this   
   test, the trolls just couldn't hit the bullseye.   
   Each question had a single right answer.   
      
   Oh, they'll lie and say they answered ALL the questions, just not to my   
   satisfaction.    
   As a group, the trolls responded 131 times to my 40 questions.    
   Out of those 131 responses, 116 ( 88.5 % ) of those responses were comments,   
   insults and questions.   
   Nothing to do with anybody's satisfaction.   
      
   We're not dealing with rational people here. We're dealing with closed-minded   
   people who refuse to look at the case impartially. They have "their own   
   truth". They've heard the prosecutor's closing arguments ( WR ) and they don't   
   have to consider the    
   testimony of the witnesses or the exhibits ( 26 volumes ) because it's all   
   "raw data". Any documentation, witnesses or evidence presented in defense of   
   the defendant is considered, "looking at the wrong things incorrectly".    
      
   This type of judicial attitude was typical in the Soviet Union during the Cold   
   War.   
      
   Some of these people may have a serious mental issue called anosognosia, but   
   most are just engaging in stubbornness or outright denial, which is a defense   
   mechanism some people use when they can't cope with difficult facts or   
   diagnoses.   
      
   Either way, whether it's a form of mental illness or just a defense mechanism,   
   they will never, ever accept ANY evidence which casts doubt on Oswald's guilt.   
   These people will lie and deceive if it suits their purpose, i.e. protecting   
   "their own truth".   
      
   Others are here only for their own "entertainment" to cast aspersions and spew   
   their hatred on those with whom they do not agree.   
   We can only hope that future generations of internet web surfers will discover   
   that these Lone Nut trolls were "historically guilty" of ignorance and   
   stupidity.   
   And that any credibility they may have had was destroyed by their own words.   
   In the meantime, the best thing we can do is to ignore these assholes and let   
   them prove to the world what they're made of.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)