From: d04108200@gmail.com   
      
   On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 8:57:22 AM UTC-8, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 7:55:03 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   > > We have a participant on this newsgroup who is of the opinion that without   
   a    
   > > criminal conviction, it is wrong declare a dead person guilty of crimes   
   they    
   > > committed while living.   
   > I never said that and I know I never said that because that's not what I   
   think.    
   > It all depends on the circumstances.   
   > > In another thread, Hank brought up several mass    
   > > shooters who died immediately following the carnage they carried out.   
   Since    
   > > we don't put dead people on trial, does that mean we can't conclude they    
   > > committed mass murder?   
   > Like I said, it all depends on the circumstances.    
   >    
   > Were the mass murderers killed by police or committed suicide at the scene   
   of the crime ?    
   > Then chances are they're guilty.    
   >    
   > Were they armed at the time they were killed ?    
   > Then chances are they're guilty.    
   >    
   > Were there witnesses who knew them, recognized them and identified them as   
   the shooter ?    
   > Then chances are they're guilty.    
   >    
   > You love to make generalizations with no regard to the circumstances.    
   > And you love to compare apples to oranges.    
   >    
   > You birdbrains always come up with comparisons that have absolutely NOTHING   
   in common with this case.    
   > "Yeah, but what about...."    
   >    
   > SMH   
      
   Corbi has the proverbial *guilty conscious*, needs attention, and shits daily   
   on the living room carpet... El Sicko comes to mind...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)