From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 5:19:10 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 2:24:06 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here   
   wrote:    
   > > What else can he do? He certainly cannot defend the Official Story. Plus,   
   he has no burden to do that. His burden only is to argue about stupid stuff   
   that doesn't matter, or even mean anything. Yes, Hank is Historically Stupid   
   for spending the last    
   few years of his life arguing about meaningless stupid stuff. Meanwhile, as   
   Hank's wife said, JFK is still dead. Great job, Hank!   
   > Yes. There is is no such thing as "historically guilty."    
   > Because there are no different "types" of guilty.    
   >    
   > No one gets convicted of being "historically guilty", "catagorically   
   guilty", "undoubtedly guilty", "partially guilty" or any other word you want   
   to put in front of "guilty".    
   > There's only "guilty".    
      
   Yet Gil continues to try to historically acquit Oswald.    
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)