home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.jfk      Discussing the assassination of JFK      99,700 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 98,237 of 99,700   
   Gil Jesus to NoTrueFlags Here   
   Re: Is Hank Sienzant Historically Stupid   
   22 Nov 23 04:13:07   
   
   From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com   
      
   On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 5:55:57 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:   
   > Well, of course! But if we are to be kind to the Retards, we can agree with   
   them that historical consensus does develop around such issues, as around   
   Oswald's guilt. But how does one define that consensus? Are the people, the   
   citizens, involved at all    
   in such a consensus? Or is it just professional money-making historians, the   
   ones who are handsomely paid by the ruling class? Since the Retards have put   
   forth the argument, the burden is upon them to provide the definition. The   
   poor dears seem to be in    
   over their heads here.   
      
   I agree.    
   The credibility of a criminal case is directly connected to the credibility of   
   the authorities making that case.   
      
   Forget that we're talking about Oswald for a minute.    
      
   Take a criminal case where:   
      
   The police were corrupt   
   Police continued to question the suspect after he had "lawyered up".   
   The police lied during their testimony under oath ( perjury )   
   There were no chain of custody forms made out for the evidence at the time of   
   discovery   
   There was no documentation proving the suspect was advised of his rights and   
   waived those rights.   
   Several items currently in evidence were not photographed as found    
   The suspect was not allowed a phone call until 1:40 pm the following day   
   The suspect's family was denied access to him until the next day   
   Legal assistance ( ACLU ) was dissuaded by police from talking to the suspect   
   The police lineups were unfair   
   The DA was corrupt and only cared about convicting the person arrested    
   The handling of the evidence by police allowed for the opportunity for   
   tampering    
   The witnesses could not identify the items in evidence as the evidence they   
   found   
   The witnesses were threatened and harassed    
   Key witnesses were ignored    
   FBI reports lied about what the witnesses said   
      
   Who TF in their right mind could accept THAT case as an air-tight case of a   
   suspect's guilt ?   
   REALLY   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca