From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 4:43:44 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 12:27:19 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:   
   > > CTs like to argue that ER doctors in a big city hospital would likely have   
   lots of    
   > > experience treating victims of gunshot wounds and that much is true. It   
   does    
   > > not follow that they would be able to distinguish an entrance wound from   
   an exit wound.   
   > Source ?   
      
   This requires reasoning, Giltardo. That leaves you out.   
      
   > > It is therefore not surprising that the ER team would believe the neat   
   round    
   > > bullet hole in JFK's throat was an entrance wound because they likely had    
   > > little to no experience with exit wound produced by FMJ bullets.   
      
   > Really ? Did any of these doctors serve in the military during World War II   
   ?    
      
   WWII ended before Malcolm Perry's 16th birthday. Ditto for Robert McClelland.    
   Do you really think they served in a WWII MASH unit? If you're going to make    
   such an idiotic suggestion, the burden is on you to establish that any member   
   of the ER team had served in a WII MASH unit.   
      
   > Was WWII fought with soft rounds fired from handguns ?    
      
   Another irrelevant diversion.    
      
   > They "had little to no experience with exit wounds produced by FMJ bullets"   
   ?    
   > Wanna try that again ?    
      
   Stands to reason. You're still out to lunch.    
   >    
   > You claim that Governor Connally's wounds were made by CE 399, a FMJ bullet.    
      
   Because it was.    
   >    
   > Did these doctors who you claim "had little to no experience with exit   
   wounds produced by FMJ bullets" correctly identify    
   > the entrance and exit wounds on Governor Connally ?    
   >    
   > Idiot.   
      
   Whether they did or didn't doesn't establish expertise in this area. Being   
   right 50% of the time doesn't establish one as an   
   expert. It would have been quite easy to establish his chest wound as the exit   
   since it blew out a section of his fifth rib.   
   Unlike you, they had the ability to reason. They saw a small round wound in   
   his throat and since they never looked at his   
   back, they were unaware there was also a small round hole there. They also had   
   no information about where the evidence   
   indicated the shots were fired from. Given they had minimal information, it is   
   not surprising they reached the wrong    
   conclusion regarding the throat wound.   
      
   Once again, Giltardo responds not with answers or arguments but with asinine   
   questions. It's his way of diverting away from   
   the points raised so he doesn't have to deal with them. He knows the ER team   
   would have had little to no experience with   
   treating victims shot with FMJ bullets so he resorts to diversion. He can't   
   come up with argument of his own so he responds   
   with questions. If he thinks he is going to change the historical narrative   
   this this pathetic tactic, he's an even bigger idiot than   
   I thought.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)