Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 98,269 of 99,700    |
|    JE Corbett to Gil Jesus    |
|    Re: If we are to accept Giltardo's argum    |
|    23 Nov 23 06:28:54    |
      From: jecorbett4@gmail.com              On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 4:06:14 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:       > On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 4:25:09 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:        > > ...Giltardo has argued that we can't say Oswald was the assassin because       he        > > was never convicted.       > You can say whatever you want to say, but the accurate description of Oswald       was that he was the ACCUSED assassin of President Kennedy.               He was accused because he did it. Both "assassin" and "accused assassin" are       equally accurate labels for Oswald.        >        > There's a difference between an ACCUSED assassin and a CONVICTED assassin.               No shit. Is that what you learned from the correspondence law school course       you took?              > The reason why you can't see that is because you're stupid.              This from the guys who still can't figure out Oswald murdered two people.               > > It is a fact that no one has ever been convicted of assassination JFK.        > > So should we conclude that nobody assassinated JFK?       > Another example of your failed reasoning.               This should be good. Giltardo is going to give us a lecture on reasoning.       That's like getting driving lessons from Ted Kennedy.              > How do you get from a homicide without a conviction to a homicide that never       occurred ?               You have told us we need a criminal conviction to determine who committed a       homicide. Since nobody has ever been        convicted, using your argument it follows that nobody committed the homicide.               > What kind of reasoning is that ?               Your kind.               > Are you suggesting that unsolved murders never occurred ?        > Is there something wrong with you ?        > Are you insane ?              Once again, Giltardo responds with questions. So here are my questions for       Giltardo?              Can we conclude you acknowledge that there are murders that are committed by       people who are never convicted.               Do you acknowledge that JFK's assassin was never convicted?              Do you acknowledge that the unconvicted assassin could have been Oswald?              Can you tell us why we can't determine that in lieu of a trial?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca