home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.jfk      Discussing the assassination of JFK      99,700 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 98,269 of 99,700   
   JE Corbett to Gil Jesus   
   Re: If we are to accept Giltardo's argum   
   23 Nov 23 06:28:54   
   
   From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 4:06:14 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 4:25:09 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   > > ...Giltardo has argued that we can't say Oswald was the assassin because   
   he    
   > > was never convicted.   
   > You can say whatever you want to say, but the accurate description of Oswald   
   was that he was the ACCUSED assassin of President Kennedy.    
      
   He was accused because he did it. Both "assassin" and "accused assassin" are   
   equally accurate labels for Oswald.    
   >    
   > There's a difference between an ACCUSED assassin and a CONVICTED assassin.    
      
   No shit. Is that what you learned from the correspondence law school course   
   you took?   
      
   > The reason why you can't see that is because you're stupid.   
      
   This from the guys who still can't figure out Oswald murdered two people.    
      
   > > It is a fact that no one has ever been convicted of assassination JFK.    
   > > So should we conclude that nobody assassinated JFK?   
   > Another example of your failed reasoning.    
      
   This should be good. Giltardo is going to give us a lecture on reasoning.   
   That's like getting driving lessons from Ted Kennedy.   
      
   > How do you get from a homicide without a conviction to a homicide that never   
   occurred ?    
      
   You have told us we need a criminal conviction to determine who committed a   
   homicide. Since nobody has ever been    
   convicted, using your argument it follows that nobody committed the homicide.    
      
   > What kind of reasoning is that ?    
      
   Your kind.    
      
   > Are you suggesting that unsolved murders never occurred ?    
   > Is there something wrong with you ?    
   > Are you insane ?   
      
   Once again, Giltardo responds with questions. So here are my questions for   
   Giltardo?   
      
   Can we conclude you acknowledge that there are murders that are committed by   
   people who are never convicted.    
      
   Do you acknowledge that JFK's assassin was never convicted?   
      
   Do you acknowledge that the unconvicted assassin could have been Oswald?   
      
   Can you tell us why we can't determine that in lieu of a trial?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca