From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 8:30:27 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 8:22:31 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   > > > On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 1:04:04 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant   
   wrote:    
   > > > If Ruby’s a proven perjuror, I'd love to see the evidence. When do you   
   intend to post it here?   
   > > You think an opinion expressed by Ruby in an unsworn statement to   
   reporters is evidence of perjury? If I were you,    
   > > I would contact that correspondence law school you got your legal training   
   from and demand your money back.   
   > You know you're responding to Hank, right ?    
   > Hank's the one talking about Ruby's perjury.    
   > I posted the video in response to the thread topic. ( Ruby implicates LBJ )    
   >    
   > Idiot.   
      
   Yes, I accidentally clicked on Hank's post rather than yours. BFD.    
      
   You posted the video in response to Hank's request for evidence that Ruby was   
   a proven perjuror. Explain how an unsworn   
   statement made by Ruby to reporters is evidence he is a proven perjuror. Or   
   did you accidentally click on Hank's post too?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)