Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 98,347 of 99,700    |
|    recipient.x@gmail.com to Gil Jesus    |
|    Re: Why the ER doctors belief that JFK's    |
|    25 Nov 23 19:03:12    |
      From: recip...@gmail.com              On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 3:43:44 AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:       > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 12:27:19 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:       > > CTs like to argue that ER doctors in a big city hospital would likely have       lots of        > > experience treating victims of gunshot wounds and that much is true. It       does        > > not follow that they would be able to distinguish an entrance wound from       an exit wound.              > Source ?              Back in the early 1990s, JAMA published a study by Vince DiMaio, CME of Bexar       county Texas (ie, San Antonio) regarding the accuracy of ER staff at       identifying       entry and exit wounds. It should be noted that DiMaio is the guy who literally       wrote the book on GSWs --it's even titled "Gunshot Wounds: Practical Aspects       of        Firearms, Ballistics, and Forensic Techniques."              DiMaio and his co-authors found that ER staff could correctly identify entry       and        exit about 67% of the time in single-shot cases, and 50% in multiple-shot       cases.       If this sounds good to you, consider that they had a binary choice --entry or       exit--       and would be expected to achieve 50% accuracy just by flipping a coin.                      > > It is therefore not surprising that the ER team would believe the neat       round        > > bullet hole in JFK's throat was an entrance wound because they likely had        > > little to no experience with exit wound produced by FMJ bullets.       >       > Really ? Did any of these doctors serve in the military during World War II       ?        > Was WWII fought with soft rounds fired from handguns ?        > They "had little to no experience with exit wounds produced by FMJ bullets"       ?        > Wanna try that again ?               Only Shaw and Gregory served as physicians during WWII. Shaw was the head       of a rear-area specialist surgery center in Paris, well behind the front       lines.        Gregory did a second stint with the Navy during the Korean War, supporting the        1st Marine Division, which would have made it either a field hospital       position,        or the next level behind that. Of the two, Gregory would have wound up with       more experience directly treating GSWs. It shows in the record. Shaw initially        thought that the bullet that fractured Connally's radius went from the palm       side        to the dorsal side. Gregory was able to set Shaw straight, as Shaw himself        admitted.                        > You claim that Governor Connally's wounds were made by CE 399, a FMJ bullet.        >        > Did these doctors who you claim "had little to no experience with exit       wounds produced by FMJ bullets" correctly identify        > the entrance and exit wounds on Governor Connally ?               Shaw got the chest right and the wrist wrong. Then again, the chest wound        was pretty obvious. Gregory got the wrist wound right. Shires and Gregory        got the thigh wound right, but that was a gimme. There was only one thigh        wound, so it could only have been the entry. Shaw, however, assumed that        there was a bullet still in the thigh, which he announced at his part in the        Parkland press conference. This turned out to not be true. So Shaw only        gets a 1.5 out of 3 score.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca