From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com   
      
   On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 6:38:11 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:   
   > You denigrated Lattimer as an "easy chair urologist", neglecting to mention   
   he was a battlefield surgeon who actually saw and treated the types of wounds   
   caused by jacketed ammunition. As such, he was far more experienced with those   
   kinds of wounds    
   than any of the doctors in Parkland.    
      
   Really ? What's the connection between urology and gunshot wounds ?   
      
   > He also had a lifelong interest in the case, performing experiments designed   
   to test the conclusions of the Commission.    
      
   Your "expert" Lattimer also participated in a phony display for the BBC/ABC of   
   how Oswald could have fired three shots in 8.5 seconds by dry firing a rifle   
   at a stationary spot on the wall.   
   Completely bogus.   
      
   https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/media-lies.mp4   
      
   In your world, a Urologist is an expert on weapons and gunshot wounds, but the   
   opinion of an expert in his field, like forensic pathologist Cyril Wecht,   
   isn't worth shit.   
   That's just brilliant, Hank.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)