From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 10:35:35 PM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:   
   > On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 4:55:29 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 12:09:02 PM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here   
   wrote:    
   > > > On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 11:57:32 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant   
   wrote:    
   > > > > On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 10:51:42 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here   
   wrote:    
   > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 12:33:23 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant   
   wrote:    
   > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 12:28:42 PM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags   
   Here wrote:    
   > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 12:16:35 PM UTC-5, Hank   
   Sienzant wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 11:24:47 AM UTC-5,   
   NoTrueFlags Here wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 11:19:37 AM UTC-5, Hank   
   Sienzant wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 11:02:11 AM UTC-5,   
   NoTrueFlags Here wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 10:45:32 AM UTC-5,   
   Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 1:24:47 AM UTC-5,   
   NoTrueFlags Here wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 11:44:59 PM   
   UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 2:27:33 AM   
   UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It really doesn't mean anything other than the   
   Official Story is that a person is guilty. Of course, the Nutter Retards are   
   going to believe the Official Story verdict, but that's all it is. The rulers   
   say Oswald did it.    
   Everybody knows that.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What’s the “the Official Story verdict” on   
   who was the Texas Tower shooter?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you believe “the Official Story verdict”   
   there?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, why? Isn’t that what ‘they’ want you   
   to believe?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If not, are you posting to the Texas Tower site   
   that Whitman was framed, and those who believe the the Official Story verdict   
   are ignorant sheeple and just believing their rulers?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If not, why not?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know anything about Your Texas Tower   
   Massacre.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Of course not. Since it happened in Texas only three   
   years after the Kennedy assassination and involved an ex-Marine with similar   
   shooting skills to Oswald shooting with a bolt-action rifle from a much higher   
   building at people    
   who were far more distant than Kennedy was from Oswald, we can’t learn   
   anything about the assassination or whether Oswald and Oswald’s weapon was   
   capable of committing the assassination.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > You want to stick with that answer or phone a friend   
   for help?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm talking about the JFK assassination because that   
   is the topic which interests me, and the topic of this newsgrouppe. Your   
   logical fallacy that Official Stories all need to be false for this one to be   
   false    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Straw-man Logical Fallacy. I never said that.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > only reveals your fundamental dishonesty.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > The “fundamental dishonesty” is from those who   
   employ logical fallacies like straw-man arguments to make a pretend rebuttal   
   to a point not made.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everybody knows what a cowardly liar you are.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > And there’s the ad hominem instead of a reasoned   
   response.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Summary: You argued against a point I didn’t make,   
   called me names, and claimed the similarities and differences between the JFK   
   assassination and the Texas Tower shooting didn’t interest you, dismissing   
   any attempt of mine to    
   draw parallels between the two and extract what we could learn from these   
   parallels.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > How CT of you.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > Sure, you'd rather talk about something that happened 3   
   years later    
   > > > > > > > > > > Another straw man argument. I want to talk about both, and   
   see what we can learn, if anything, from another shooting in Texas by an   
   ex-Marine with similar shooting skills to Oswald shooting with a bolt-action   
   rifle from a much higher    
   building at people who were far more distant than Kennedy was from Oswald. You   
   apparently don’t want to talk about that, or learn anything from it.    
   > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > > Do I understand your point correctly?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > because you can't defend your ridiculous Lone Nut   
   theories.    
   > > > > > > > > > > Please be explicit and specific about what I said that you   
   deem ridiculous.    
   > > > > > > > > > > Go ahead, we’ll wait.    
   > > > > > > > > > I don't care about your true crime analogy because Oswald   
   did not shoot any rifle from the TSBD.    
   > > > > > > > > “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” —   
   Carl Sagan.    
   > > > > > > > > Awaiting your extraordinary evidence. Go ahead, we’ll wait.    
   > > > > > > > > > Why should I argue that he could or couldn't have done what   
   he obviously did not do?    
   > > > > > > > > Begged Question Logical Fallacy. You need to establish that,   
   not simply proclaim it as a given.    
   > > > > > > > > > You are trying to have an argument with somebody else. I   
   don't know who and I don't care who.    
   > > > > > > > > No, I'm trying to have a discussion with you about what the   
   evidence establishes about the Kennedy assassination. You keep ducking out of   
   that discussion, yet you claim to be interested in the Kennedy assassination   
   (”I'm talking about    
   the JFK assassination because that is the topic which interests me”). I've   
   said we can learn something about Oswald’s rifle capabilities from the   
   Charles Whitman* Texas Tower shooting, and despite claiming Oswald was a   
   shooter (and deserving of the    
   death penalty, no less), you don't want to talk about that other shooting, or   
   what we can learn from it.    
   > > > > > > > > > That's something for you and your psychiatrist to work out.    
   > > > > > > > > And there’s the ad hominem we knew you couldn't wait to   
   utter. Why not just cut to the chase and simply call me names?    
   > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > ________    
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)