From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 11:55:18 PM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:   
   > On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 11:32:13 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   > > On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 10:35:35 PM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here   
   wrote:    
   > > > On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 4:55:29 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > > > On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 12:09:02 PM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here   
   wrote:    
   > > > > > On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 11:57:32 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant   
   wrote:    
   > > > > > > On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 10:51:42 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags   
   Here wrote:    
   > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 12:33:23 PM UTC-5, Hank   
   Sienzant wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 12:28:42 PM UTC-5,   
   NoTrueFlags Here wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 12:16:35 PM UTC-5, Hank   
   Sienzant wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 11:24:47 AM UTC-5,   
   NoTrueFlags Here wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 11:19:37 AM UTC-5,   
   Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 11:02:11 AM UTC-5,   
   NoTrueFlags Here wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 10:45:32 AM   
   UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 1:24:47 AM   
   UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 11:44:59 PM   
   UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 2:27:33 AM   
   UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It really doesn't mean anything other than   
   the Official Story is that a person is guilty. Of course, the Nutter Retards   
   are going to believe the Official Story verdict, but that's all it is. The   
   rulers say Oswald did it.    
   Everybody knows that.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What’s the “the Official Story verdict”   
   on who was the Texas Tower shooter?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you believe “the Official Story   
   verdict” there?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, why? Isn’t that what ‘they’ want   
   you to believe?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If not, are you posting to the Texas Tower   
   site that Whitman was framed, and those who believe the the Official Story   
   verdict are ignorant sheeple and just believing their rulers?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If not, why not?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know anything about Your Texas Tower   
   Massacre.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Of course not. Since it happened in Texas only   
   three years after the Kennedy assassination and involved an ex-Marine with   
   similar shooting skills to Oswald shooting with a bolt-action rifle from a   
   much higher building at    
   people who were far more distant than Kennedy was from Oswald, we can’t   
   learn anything about the assassination or whether Oswald and Oswald’s weapon   
   was capable of committing the assassination.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You want to stick with that answer or phone a   
   friend for help?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm talking about the JFK assassination because   
   that is the topic which interests me, and the topic of this newsgrouppe. Your   
   logical fallacy that Official Stories all need to be false for this one to be   
   false    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Straw-man Logical Fallacy. I never said that.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > only reveals your fundamental dishonesty.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The “fundamental dishonesty” is from those who   
   employ logical fallacies like straw-man arguments to make a pretend rebuttal   
   to a point not made.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everybody knows what a cowardly liar you are.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And there’s the ad hominem instead of a reasoned   
   response.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Summary: You argued against a point I didn’t   
   make, called me names, and claimed the similarities and differences between   
   the JFK assassination and the Texas Tower shooting didn’t interest you,   
   dismissing any attempt of    
   mine to draw parallels between the two and extract what we could learn from   
   these parallels.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How CT of you.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure, you'd rather talk about something that   
   happened 3 years later    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Another straw man argument. I want to talk about both,   
   and see what we can learn, if anything, from another shooting in Texas by an   
   ex-Marine with similar shooting skills to Oswald shooting with a bolt-action   
   rifle from a much    
   higher building at people who were far more distant than Kennedy was from   
   Oswald. You apparently don’t want to talk about that, or learn anything from   
   it.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Do I understand your point correctly?    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > because you can't defend your ridiculous Lone Nut   
   theories.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be explicit and specific about what I said that   
   you deem ridiculous.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Go ahead, we’ll wait.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > I don't care about your true crime analogy because   
   Oswald did not shoot any rifle from the TSBD.    
   > > > > > > > > > > “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”   
   — Carl Sagan.    
   > > > > > > > > > > Awaiting your extraordinary evidence. Go ahead, we’ll   
   wait.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > Why should I argue that he could or couldn't have done   
   what he obviously did not do?    
   > > > > > > > > > > Begged Question Logical Fallacy. You need to establish   
   that, not simply proclaim it as a given.    
   > > > > > > > > > > > You are trying to have an argument with somebody else. I   
   don't know who and I don't care who.    
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)