From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 5:07:02 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 10:29:47 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   > > JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few    
   > > cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much   
   less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than    
   > > what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues   
   to    
   > > wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the    
   > > population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient   
   history.    
   > > Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it.   
   The    
   > > news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of    
   > > assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the   
   country,    
   > > it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit   
   what we    
   > > say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK   
   assassination.   
   > Another of your lies.    
   > No interest in the subject ?    
      
   Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I   
   said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to   
   make your point.   
      
   > If that's true, then why are you here ?    
      
   For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody   
   is going to move the needle of public opinion.   
      
   > Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a   
   lie.    
      
   Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the   
   subject. What the hell did you think I meant when   
   I wrote:   
      
   " Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about   
   it."?   
      
   Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of   
   the niche groups of which I spoke.   
   >    
   > You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with   
   people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was   
   closed 60 years ago.    
      
   The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains   
   the definitive explanation of the    
   assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong   
   although they did correctly ID Oswald as the   
   assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that   
   little piece of shit without success.    
      
   > Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game   
   is over ?    
      
   Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that   
   out to the clowns.    
      
   > Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict   
   ?   
      
   Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.   
       
   > Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?    
      
   To point out the futility of the clowns.   
      
   > Does that make any sense ?   
      
   Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.   
       
   > What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?    
      
   I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the   
   clowns and I don't have any reason to believe   
   there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing   
   the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years   
   ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and   
   pointed to some of my arguments that had   
   changed his mind. I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a   
   contributor on the McAdams board but that   
   was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this   
   one.   
   >    
   > You people have offered NOTHING new in the form of evidence in 60 years.    
      
   We already have the hay in the barn. There have been technology advancements   
   which have served to confirm the findings   
   of the WC which used what they had available at the time. We have been able to   
   reduce the window of when the single    
   bullet struck to a few frames from the 210-225 window the WC concluded.   
      
   > You just keep running around in circles, chasing your tails and repeating   
   the nonsense of the Warren Commission.    
      
   Actually, were's sitting in our easy chairs watching the clowns spin their   
   wheels.   
      
   > And when the inconsistencies in the evidence are pointed out to you, you try   
   to explain them away by making excuses.    
   > When I present official records questioning Oswald's guilt, you claim I'm   
   looking at "the wrong things incorrectly".    
   >    
   The excuses all come from your side. The evidence all point to Oswald so your   
   entire case is based on coming up with   
   excuses to dismiss the evidence.    
      
   > ROFLMAO    
   >    
   > Why on earth should you or anyone else care about what I, Ben, Dave Healy,   
   Greg Parker, No Flags, or anyone else thinks about what happened to President   
   Kennedy ?    
      
   Good question. The answer is we don't. We are amused by your feeble efforts.   
      
   Now for my question. Just what have you accomplished over the past several   
   decades and what is it you hope to accomplish   
   in the future? What is your endgame?   
      
   > No, I can tell you from EXPERIENCE that there's PLENTY of interest in this   
   case. Not to brag but instead to make my point, this year alone I've done four   
   webcast appearances "back by popular demand".    
      
   Just how many viewers do you think you drew and what reason do you have to   
   believe any of them were not already part of   
   the niche interest group of which I wrote earlier.   
      
   > You'd prefer all of us to think that nobody cares so we could pack up and   
   quit posting.    
      
   Once again you resort to lying about my position. I have said interest in the   
   subject is limited to a very small niche group. If   
   you believe otherwise, you are only fooling yourself. What percentage of the   
   American people do you think even know this   
   group exists. I would wager that the actual percentage would have a lot of   
   zeros to the right of the decimal point.    
      
   > But that's not the truth and that's not going to happen.    
      
   I know that's not going to happen. That's what makes it so funny, seeing a   
   bunch of clowns kicking a dead horse. The hobby   
   will die when the clowns have all joined folks like Mark Lane, Harold   
   Weisberg, Jim Marrs, Tom Rossley, etc. who all went to   
   their graves without ever being able to prove the unproveable, that someone   
   other than Oswald took part in the assassination   
   of JFK. Nothing you have done in the past and nothing you will ever do is   
   going to rewrite history. I think you realize that, even   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)