From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 2:21:51 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:   
   > On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 11:31:24 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 7:44:18 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   > > > On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 5:07:02 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:    
   > > > > On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 10:29:47 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   > > > > > JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected,   
   a few    
   > > > > > cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were   
   much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less   
   than    
   > > > > > what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject   
   continues to    
   > > > > > wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of   
   the    
   > > > > > population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient   
   history.    
   > > > > > Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of   
   it. The    
   > > > > > news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups   
   of    
   > > > > > assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the   
   country,    
   > > > > > it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a   
   shit what we    
   > > > > > say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK   
   assassination.    
   > > > > Another of your lies.    
   > > > > No interest in the subject ?    
   > > > Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject.   
   I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to    
   > > > make your point.    
   > > > > If that's true, then why are you here ?    
   > > > For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by   
   anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.    
   > > > > Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that   
   that's a lie.    
   > > > Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in   
   the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when    
   > > > I wrote:    
   > > >    
   > > > " Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue   
   about it."?    
   > > >    
   > > > Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part   
   of the niche groups of which I spoke.    
   > > > >    
   > > > > You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day   
   with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that   
   was closed 60 years ago.    
   > > > The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which   
   remains the definitive explanation of the    
   > > > assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong   
   although they did correctly ID Oswald as the    
   > > > assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that   
   little piece of shit without success.    
   > > > > Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the   
   game is over ?    
   > > > Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing   
   that out to the clowns.    
   > > > > Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its   
   verdict ?    
   > > > Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.    
   > > > > Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?    
   > > > To point out the futility of the clowns.    
   > > > > Does that make any sense ?    
   > > > Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.    
   > > > > What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?    
   > > > I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds   
   of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe    
   > > > there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in   
   changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years    
   > > > ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN   
   and pointed to some of my arguments that had    
   > > > changed his mind.    
   > > I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of   
   using an acronym backwards as his last name.    
   > >    
   > > That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real   
   Assassin.    
   > >    
   > > Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs   
   everywhere).    
   > > > I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor   
   on the McAdams board but that    
   > > > was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted   
   on this one.    
   > > At the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no   
   doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private   
   practice so where in Alaska.   
   > Here Nutter Loon Hank Sienzant cites "Bob" as a probable bullet wound expert   
   because he thinks "Bob" worked in an emergency room. And because "Bob" is a   
   Nutter Loon, no doubt his primary qualification. Nutters really are insane.   
   That's why they are    
   called Nutters!   
      
   Like I said above, “who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the   
   motto of CTs everywhere).”   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)