From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, November 30, 2023 at 8:20:53 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:   
   > Later that evening, they had enough evidence to charge him with the   
   assasssination.   
      
   List that evidence.   
      
   > > > No, I'm challenging your claim that witnesses were under oath when they   
   "testified" that the FBI reports is not what they said.    
      
   > > I've already cited the testimony. When asked under oath, several witnesses   
   testified that they never said what the FBI reports said they said. ( 6 H 205,   
   2 H 240, 9 H 444, 15 H 745, 2 H 201 )    
   > > Among those witnesses were :    
   > >    
   > > Robert Edwards ( 6 H 205 )   
   > > Buell Frazier ( 2 H 240 )   
   > > Michael Paine ( 9 H 444 )   
   > > B.M. Patterson ( 15 H 745 )   
   > > James Worrell( 2 H 201 )   
      
   > Please provide examples of these people saying "under oath" that the FBI   
   reports were inaccurate.   
      
   I just did. Can't you read ?   
      
   > > That's in ADDITION to the witnesses Mark Lane interviewed.    
   > > Ever hear of consilience ? The principle that evidence from independent,   
   unrelated sources can "converge" on strong conclusions ?    
   > > Is that enough corroborating evidence for you ?    
   > > Probably not.    
   > >   
   > Your wild accusations are no evidence.   
      
   You're the one not posting citations.   
      
   > The class dunce just called me an idiot. That's going to ruin my day.   
      
      
   ROFLMAO. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)