Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 98,489 of 99,700    |
|    Gil Jesus to Steven Galbraith    |
|    Re: Herchel Jacks: "It appeared that the    |
|    02 Dec 23 09:35:52    |
      From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com              On Saturday, December 2, 2023 at 9:23:01 AM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote:       > So he sees a wound on the right side of the head but no wound in the       back/rear? Where's the wound in the back of his head? The conspiracy claim is       that the back of JFK's head was blown out by a bullet. Where does he see this?               Well, I guess if HE didn't see it, then it didn't exist.              But what about the 40 witnesses who told the HSCA that they DID see a wound at       the back of the head ?       https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/40-witnesses.png              What about the autopsy report that describes, "a large irregular defect" that       extends, "somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions". ( 16 H 980 )       Where is the "occipital region" of the skull located, Professor ?              And where is the "large irregular defect" in that region depicted in this       autopsy photo ?       https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/BE4_HI.jpg              And why is the contour of the back of the head in that photo perfect, not       showing any signs of missing bone ?       Professor ?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca