home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.jfk      Discussing the assassination of JFK      99,700 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 98,489 of 99,700   
   Gil Jesus to Steven Galbraith   
   Re: Herchel Jacks: "It appeared that the   
   02 Dec 23 09:35:52   
   
   From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com   
      
   On Saturday, December 2, 2023 at 9:23:01 AM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote:   
   > So he sees a wound on the right side of the head but no wound in the   
   back/rear? Where's the wound in the back of his head? The conspiracy claim is   
   that the back of JFK's head was blown out by a bullet. Where does he see this?    
      
   Well, I guess if HE didn't see it, then it didn't exist.   
      
   But what about the 40 witnesses who told the HSCA that they DID see a wound at   
   the back of the head ?   
   https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/40-witnesses.png   
      
   What about the autopsy report that describes, "a large irregular defect" that   
   extends, "somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions". ( 16 H 980 )   
   Where is the "occipital region" of the skull located, Professor ?   
      
   And where is the "large irregular defect" in that region depicted in this   
   autopsy photo ?   
   https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/BE4_HI.jpg   
      
   And why is the contour of the back of the head in that photo perfect, not   
   showing any signs of missing bone ?   
   Professor ?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca