From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Monday, December 4, 2023 at 2:02:30 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Monday, December 4, 2023 at 1:51:59 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   > < another post full of comments and insults but no evidence >    
   >    
   > The guy who NEVER answers my questions is mad because I won't answer his.    
   > ROFLMAO   
      
   It's not that you won't. It's that you can't. You know the answers destroy   
   your narrative so as always, you dodge them.    
      
   My answers are the ones found in the history books and accepted by virtually   
   every reputable source. Oswald was the    
   assassin. I acknowledge the widespread belief he had accomplices, but I've   
   never seen any compelling evidence of    
   such. I am satisfied with the historical narrative as is. You on the other   
   hand are the one wanting to change that historical   
   narrative. To do that you are going to have to make the case for Oswald's   
   innocence, and you aren't going to be able to   
   do that unless you grow a pair and start dealing with the inconvenient truths.   
   The inconvenient truth on this matter is    
   that the entire upper right side of JFK's skull was blown open, from the   
   occipital bone, to through the parietal bone, and   
   into the temporal bone. The inconvenient truth doesn't jive with your false   
   narrative that the headshot came from the front   
   and blew out the back of the head, so you simply choose to avoid that truth by   
   avoiding any questions posed to you regarding   
   the defect in the skull.    
      
   I have yet to see you respond to my pointing out of your false claim that   
   there was outward beveling in rear of the skull. I   
   quoted the passage from the autopsy report that indicated the beveling was   
   inward. I know this is another inconvenient truth   
   for you to dodge so I am not expecting your response.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)