From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com   
      
   On Tuesday, December 5, 2023 at 8:14:12 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:   
   > You will suggest a pre-autopsy in which “they” removed those bullets,   
   but you won't explain how that could be done without leaving evidence on the   
   body of post-mortem surgery.    
      
   Maybe you should read page 4 of the Siebert/O'Neill report.   
      
   > No, we have an exit at the front of the throat   
   Prove it. Name someone who saw the throat wound prior to the tracheostomy and   
   described it conclusively as a wound of exit.   
      
   > But that is not what Gil and CTs everywhere are positing. They posit a   
   conspiracy that could alter all the evidence to point to Oswald. That sounds   
   like a thorough and omnipotent one.   
      
   Tell that to the 19 innocent men who Henry Wade had convicted and whose   
   convictions were overturned on DNA evidence.   
   https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791   
      
   Tell that to the family of the innocent man Henry Wade convinced a jury to   
   send to the electric chair in 1954.   
   https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/may/henry   
   wade-executed-innocent-man/   
      
   You're living in LALA land, Hank. You're obviously naive about the way things   
   work in the real world.   
   Ask Frank Serpico about police corruption in the 60s.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)