From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, December 7, 2023 at 5:43:20 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Tuesday, December 5, 2023 at 8:15:02 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   > > You also ignore the fact that no bullet remained in JFK's throat. No   
   bullet was found anywhere in JFK''s body.    
   >    
   > Xrays showed no bullet in the body.    
   > At what time were the Xrays taken ?   
      
   Does it matter? Do you think bullets just dissolve after a few hours?   
      
   This is where once again, your piss poor reasoning skills betray you. You look   
   at the assassination bassackwards. Instead of   
   looking at the evidence and following it to a logical conclusion, you reverse   
   engineer the process. You start with the    
   conclusion that there was a conspiracy, a coverup, and a framing of Oswald and   
   work backwards from them. Anything that   
   is necessary for those things to be true must have happened, even if there is   
   no evidence those things happened. This is just   
   the latest example of your methodology. You have accepted as a matter of faith   
   that the bullet wound in JFK's throat was an   
   entrance wound. In order to explain why there are two entrance wounds and no   
   exit wounds and no bullets in the body, you   
   assume somebody must have removed the bullets, even thought there is no   
   evidence of that ever happening. I must have   
   happened or there would still be bullets in the body. You refuse to take into   
   account how unlikely it would be for a low    
   velocity bullet fired from any distance to strike the intended target and the   
   fact you need not one but two such bullets. You   
   refuse to even entertain the possibility that maybe one of the bullet wounds   
   was and entrance and one was an exit. Since the   
   back wound was provably and entrance, process of elimination would dictate the   
   throat wound was an exit. You also ignore   
   the fact that after the internal organs were removed at autopsy, a trail of   
   tissue damage was observed from the entrance wound   
   to the contusion on the pleura, to the perforation of the strap muscles, to   
   the nick on the trachea, all leading to the incision   
   that was made over the bullet wound in the throat. You ignore all that because   
   you have already decided that JFK was killed   
   by multiple gunman firing from both in front and behind him and since a bullet   
   striking JFK in the back and exiting from his   
   throat is incompatible with your preconceived conclusion, you decide that   
   couldn't have been what happened. It doesn't   
   matter to you that a bullet striking JFK in the back and exiting from his   
   throat is the simplest and most straight forward   
   explanation for what the medical evidence indicates, you already know JFK was   
   shot from the back AND the front, so the   
   medical evidence be damned, he was hit in the back and the throat and somebody   
   must have removed the two bullets prior   
   to the x-rays being taken which showed no bullets in the body.   
      
   Great methodology you have there, Giltardo. That's why 60 years later, you   
   still can't figure out a simple case of murder.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)