From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, December 7, 2023 at 5:37:02 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Wednesday, December 6, 2023 at 1:53:15 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > Ben needs to explain why this conspiracy would shoot JFK from multiple   
   directions, then try to frame one lone shooter who was a poor shot with a   
   crappy rifle, instead of shooting JFK with a shooter from one place > with a   
   good weapon, then frame    
   Oswald for owning that rifle and making those shots with that good weapon.   
   > Most professional assassins have their own personal weapons of choice.    
   > Do you really believe that a killer would sacrifice losing that weapon just   
   to frame some warehouse schmuck ?    
   > No, they're going to frame the guy with another weapon. A piece of junk that   
   no one's going to miss.   
      
   How do you suppose your professional assassin managed to flee the TSBD   
   carrying his weapon of choice without   
   anybody noticing? Why would a professional assassin want to try to kill JFK   
   with a low powered weapon capable of making   
   only a shallow penetration into JFK''s back?How did your conspirators get   
   Oswald's rifle? How did they even know he had a   
   rifle? How did they knew where he kept it? One last question.    
      
   Since all of the above are inconvenient questions, I'm not expecting you to   
   answer but instead come up with another of your   
   lame excuses for not answering.   
      
   > > These are the arguments advanced by Gil, Ben, and many others. It makes no   
   sense. And that’s why we don't see any explanation forthcoming.   
   > It makes no sense to you, of course.   
      
   Nor to any sensible person.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)