From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, December 7, 2023 at 11:43:02 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Thursday, December 7, 2023 at 8:15:26 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:   
   > > Giltardo wants us to believe that his imaginary frontal shooter fired a   
   shot    
   > > into JFK's throat that made only a shallow penetration. Then he wants us   
   to    
   > > believe the same shooter fired a frontal shot into JFK's head that   
   shattered    
   > > his skull, caused a massive explosive head wound, splattered blood and    
   > > brain tissue everywhere, and blew out the back of JFK's head. Did the   
   shooter    
   > > switch guns between shots?    
   > >    
   > > Or maybe Giltardo believes the conspirators placed two shooters in front    
   > > of JFK who were never seen by anybody. Maybe the conspiracy was on a    
   > > budget and could only afford to equip one of the shooters with a high   
   powered    
   > > weapon. The other had to make do with whatever he could come up with, and    
   > > that was a Saturday Night Special.   
   > I don't want you to believe anything. I'm not trying to convince you of   
   anything.    
   > In fact, I don't give a flying fuck WHAT you believe.    
   > That's your business.    
   >    
   > YOU'RE the one who has a problem with what I believe.    
   > YOU'RE the one calling the names like the small-minded idiot you are.    
   > YOU'RE the one who can't back up what you say with evidence.    
   > YOU'RE the one constantly being caught in lies.    
   >    
   > Tell us, in what year can we expect you to post some actual evidence ?   
      
   Giltardo, you are the one who wants history rewritten. The burden is therefore   
   on you to   
   convince a whole lot of other people as to why that should be done. If that is   
   not your   
   goal, then just what is it you are trying to accomplish with these never   
   ending questions   
   you raise but never try to answer.   
      
   I have no case to make. That was already done by the Warren Commission. I have   
   looked    
   at their case and found it compelling. They correctly identified Oswald as the   
   assassin and   
   the murderer of J.D. Tippit. Those findings have been widely accepted, even by   
   people who   
   don't believe Oswald was acting alone when he assassinated JFK. I am perfectly   
   comfortable   
   with the status quo. I have no burden to change anybody's mind. I really don't   
   care if a few   
   wackos want to believe Oswald was an innocent man framed by a vast conspiracy   
   within   
   the government. I'm just someone who finds a bit of fiendish pleasure in   
   pointing out to the   
   wackos, how silly and illogical their ideas are. Yes, I'm the guy on the beach   
   who keeps kicking   
   over your conspiracy sandcastles. Not that it is terribly difficult.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)