From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 11:54:32 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 11:31:41 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   > > I suppose it never entered that pinhead of yours that there are other ways   
   of determining a bullet path other than a probe.   
   > Source ?   
      
   How about the autopsy report which I have already posted for you twice which   
   explains how the pathologists were able to   
   find the bullet track without using a probe.   
      
   You might want to check Finck's Clay Shaw trial testimony which explains why   
   using a probe can create a false channel in   
   soft tissue.   
      
   Q: Did you attempt to probe this wound in the back of the neck?   
   A: I did.   
   Q: With what?   
   A: With an autopsy room probe, and I did not succeed in probing from the entry   
   in the back of the neck in any direction and I can explain this. This was due   
   to the contraction of muscles preventing the passage of an instrument, and if   
   I had forced the    
   probe through the neck I may have created a false passage.   
   Q: Isn't this good enough reason to you as a pathologist to go further and   
   dissect this area in an attempt to ascertain whether or not there is a   
   passageway here as a result of a bullet?   
   A: I did not consider a dissection of the path.   
   Q: How far did the probe go into the back of the neck?   
   A: Repeat the question.   
   Q: How far did the probe go into this wound?   
   A: I couldn't introduce this probe for any extended depth. I tried and I can   
   give explanations why. At times you cannot probe a path, this is because of   
   the contraction of muscles and different layers. It is not like a pipe, like a   
   channel. It may be    
   extremely difficult to probe a wound through muscle.   
   Q: Can you give me approximately how far in this probe went?   
   A: The first fraction of an inch.   
      
   The probe could only go in a fraction of an inch. Are we supposed to believe   
   that indicates the bullet only went in a fraction   
   of an inch or does it make more sense to believe the bullet traveled much   
   deeper than the probe could go?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)