home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.jfk      Discussing the assassination of JFK      99,700 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 98,640 of 99,700   
   JE Corbett to Gil Jesus   
   Re: John Connally's Wrist Wound Bullet D   
   08 Dec 23 12:42:39   
   
   From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 12:41:23 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 10:43:43 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 06:23:52 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus    
   > >  wrote:    
   > > >On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 9:02:37?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   > > >> > That's because the prosectors saw the trail of tissue damage the led   
   from the entry wound on the back directly to the incision in the throat    
   > > >    
   > > >Source ?    
   > > You cannot cite for a lie.   
   > Flags' original post was supported by the links to the evidence I posted.    
   > The assholes can't refute that, as usual.    
   > SO they either have to change the subject or attack me.    
   >    
   The two of you have contended the WC changed the direction of the bullet yet   
   neither of you has posted what the WC had to   
   say about the wrist one. This is how the WC dealt with the wrist wound:   
      
   [quote on]   
   At the time of the shooting, Governor Connally was unaware that he had   
   sustained any injuries other than his chest wounds.213 On the back of his arm,   
   about 2 inches (5 centimeters) above the wrist joint on the thumb side, Dr.   
   Charles F. Gregory observed    
   a linear perforating wound approximately one-fifth of an inch (one-half   
   centimeter) wide and 1 inch (2 1/2 centimeters) long.214 During his operation   
   on this injury, the doctor concluded that this ragged wound was the point of   
   entry because thread and    
   cloth had been carried into the wound to the region of the bone.215 Dr.   
   Gregory's conclusions were also based upon the location in the Governor's   
   wrist, as revealed by X-ray, of small fragments of metal shed by the missile   
   upon striking the firm surface    
   of the bone.216 Evidence of different amounts of air in the tissues of the   
   wrist gave further indication that the bullet passed from the back to the   
   front of the wrist.217 An examination of the palm surface of the wrist showed   
   a wound approximately one-   
   fifth of an inch (one-half centimeter) long and approximately three-fourths of   
   an inch (2 centimeters) above the crease of the right wrist.218 Dr. Shaw had   
   initially believed that the missile entered on the palm side of the Governor's   
   wrist and exited on    
   the back side.219 After reviewing the factors considered by Dr. Gregory,   
   however, Dr. Shaw withdrew his earlier opinion. He deferred to the judgment of   
   Dr. Gregory, who had more closely examined that wound during the wrist   
   operation.   
   [quote off]   
      
   The conflict is not between Dr. Shaw and the WC but between Dr. Shaw's initial   
   opinion and Dr. Gregory's. While Dr. Shaw was   
   the head of the surgical team, it was Dr.Gregory who performed the surgery on   
   the wrist. It is not surprising therefore that   
   Dr. Shaw would defer to Dr. Gregory's opinion since he had looked much more   
   closely at the wrist wounds. The WC was totally   
   transparent about this and reported both Dr. Shaw's original opinion and the   
   fact he changed his mind after seeing Gregory's   
   findings.    
      
      
   > IMO, Corbett's losing it. He's gotten more vicious with each post.   
      
   Giltardo's way of saying I have become more critical of his silly ideas with   
   each post.    
       
   > It's funny how people on our side don't care about what the LNers believe,   
   but they have a problem with what we believe.    
   > So who's the "kook" here ?    
   > The person who believes that everyone is entitled to his or her opinion, or   
   the asshole who says, "you have to believe what I believe" ?   
      
   Giltardo lies again. He has to make up quotes and attribute them to me because   
   he can't refute what I actually have to say.   
   That tells us all we need to know about Giltardo.    
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca