From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 6:15:48 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 5:42:04 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > I thought you knew all about what was admissible and what was not.   
   > I'm not more knowledgeable than you, of course.   
      
   You claimed to be previously. Which assertion is false?   
      
   > With your vast experience building cases against suspects and degree in the   
   criminal justice field and all the hours you've spent in court.    
   > I cannot stand against such genius.    
      
   A logical fallacy called an appeal to ridicule:   
   https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Appeal-to-Ridicule   
      
      
   > But at least I don't need my wife's permission to go on line.    
      
   A logical fallacy called a strawman argument:   
   https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Strawman-Fallacy   
      
   > ROFLMAO   
      
   You admit by concession and deletion you were wrong to argue the point.    
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)