From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Saturday, December 9, 2023 at 7:49:22 PM UTC-5, recip...@gmail.com wrote:   
   > On Saturday, December 9, 2023 at 12:39:54 PM UTC-6, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 12:18:06 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett    
   > >  wrote:    
   >    
   > > >You might want to check Finck's Clay Shaw trial testimony which explains   
   why using a probe can create a false channel in    
   > > >soft tissue.    
   > >    
   > > How did he know this?    
   > >    
   > > Could it be that using a probe is a standard medical practice?   
   > In the words of Werner Spitz, the former Chief Medical Examiner for Wayne   
   County (i.e Detroit) Michigan, the proper way to determine the wounds track is   
   to "go into the body and follow the trail of Haemorrhage."   
      
   My AI app, which searches numerous online sources then summarizes its findings   
   had this to say about how a wound track   
   is determined:   
      
   "When a bullet enters a body, it creates a wound channel that can be used to   
   determine the bullet’s path. Forensic pathologists use a variety of   
   techniques to determine the bullet’s trajectory, including examining the   
   entry and exit wounds, analyzing    
   the damage to the surrounding tissue, and using X-rays and CT scans to create   
   a 3D image of the bullet’s path.   
      
   The forensic pathologist will first examine the entry wound and note its shape   
   and edges. The pathologist will then examine the surrounding tissue to   
   determine the bullet’s path through the body. If the bullet passes through   
   the body, the pathologist    
   will also examine the exit wound to help determine the bullet’s trajectory3.   
      
   In addition to examining the wounds, forensic pathologists may also use   
   ballistics, which is the physics of a projectile’s motion, to analyze the   
   trajectory and impact of one or multiple bullets entering the body."   
      
   The original autopsy team at first was unaware the bullet had exited and once   
   they learned that, they discovered the exit   
   wound had been obliterated by the tracheotomy incision. They did follow some   
   of these above procedures to discover he   
   bullet had passed through the upper torso to the point where the incision had   
   been made so it became a logical conclusion   
   that the bullet had exited where the tracheotomy incision had been made, a   
   conclusion confirmed by speaking to Dr. Perry on   
   the phone. The conclusion was based on hard evidence, not speculation nor   
   assumption.    
      
   Note that the use of a probe is NOT a standard procedure for determining a   
   bullet track.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)