Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 98,676 of 99,700    |
|    JE Corbett to Gil Jesus    |
|    Re: Huckster Telling Unsupportable Whopp    |
|    10 Dec 23 05:00:43    |
      From: jecorbett4@gmail.com              On Sunday, December 10, 2023 at 5:10:47 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:       > On Saturday, December 9, 2023 at 11:36:45 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:        >        > > Apparently you are too stupid to explain anything. You can't tell us why       this even matters. That seems to be a common thread        > > with conspiracy hobbyists. They find a couple things that don't quite fit       together and to them that is an AHA moment. They        > > can't tell us why the anomaly is significant.       > The man is correct. You're too stupid to understand and you always have to       have everything explained to you, so here it is.               It is the burden of those who think these things are significant to explain       why they are significant. It's not my fault that you       are not up to the challenge.              > Because we're talking about opposite ends of the wrist, the identifications       of the wounds are significant because they determine the direction from which       the shot that hit the wrist was fired.               Now tell us why it is significant that Shaw's initial opinion was different       from Gregory's and that Shaw later changed       his mind.              > If the entry wound was on the dorsal side, it was from one direction, if it       was on the palm side, the shot came from the opposite direction.        > I really don't know why you couldn't understand that.              The entry side doesn't tell us which direction the shot came from because the       forearm can be turned so the palm faces up       or the palm faces down. Connally' wrist was in his lap in a horizontal       position so the entry on the dorsal side only tells us       his wrist was palm down. It gives no indication whether that was from in front       or behind. We have ample other evidence       that tells us he was hit from behind. It would not be possible for his wrist       to have been hit by a frontal because there wasn't        anyplace in front of the limo that was elevated enough to fire a shot on a       steep enough downward trajectory to strike        Connally's wrist.               Of course you were never able to figure any of this out on your own because       you eschew the process of applying reasoning       to the available evidence.               --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca