home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.jfk      Discussing the assassination of JFK      99,700 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 98,676 of 99,700   
   JE Corbett to Gil Jesus   
   Re: Huckster Telling Unsupportable Whopp   
   10 Dec 23 05:00:43   
   
   From: jecorbett4@gmail.com   
      
   On Sunday, December 10, 2023 at 5:10:47 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Saturday, December 9, 2023 at 11:36:45 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   >    
   > > Apparently you are too stupid to explain anything. You can't tell us why   
   this even matters. That seems to be a common thread    
   > > with conspiracy hobbyists. They find a couple things that don't quite fit   
   together and to them that is an AHA moment. They    
   > > can't tell us why the anomaly is significant.   
   > The man is correct. You're too stupid to understand and you always have to   
   have everything explained to you, so here it is.    
      
   It is the burden of those who think these things are significant to explain   
   why they are significant. It's not my fault that you   
   are not up to the challenge.   
      
   > Because we're talking about opposite ends of the wrist, the identifications   
   of the wounds are significant because they determine the direction from which   
   the shot that hit the wrist was fired.    
      
   Now tell us why it is significant that Shaw's initial opinion was different   
   from Gregory's and that Shaw later changed   
   his mind.   
      
   > If the entry wound was on the dorsal side, it was from one direction, if it   
   was on the palm side, the shot came from the opposite direction.    
   > I really don't know why you couldn't understand that.   
      
   The entry side doesn't tell us which direction the shot came from because the   
   forearm can be turned so the palm faces up   
   or the palm faces down.  Connally' wrist was in his lap in a horizontal   
   position so the entry on the dorsal side only tells us   
   his wrist was palm down. It gives no indication whether that was from in front   
   or behind. We have ample other evidence   
   that tells us he was hit from behind. It would not be possible for his wrist   
   to have been hit by a frontal because there wasn't    
   anyplace in front of the limo that was elevated enough to fire a shot on a   
   steep enough downward trajectory to strike    
   Connally's wrist.    
      
   Of course you were never able to figure any of this out on your own because   
   you eschew the process of applying reasoning   
   to the available evidence.    
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca