Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 98,717 of 99,700    |
|    JE Corbett to JE Corbett    |
|    Re: Huckster Telling Unsupportable Whopp    |
|    12 Dec 23 10:17:55    |
      From: jecorbett4@gmail.com              On Tuesday, December 12, 2023 at 8:57:31 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:              > As usual, you're lying Gil. I have made no such claim. I cited DVP as a       source. His website allows us to toggle between        > frames. Toggling between Z223-224 shows us JBC's jacket suddenly bulge       outward, indicating that is the time frame        > the bullet struck. Toggling between Z224-225 shows us JFK's right arm was       still moving downward between those frames,        > indicating that although he had just been struck by the bullet, his       reflexive action had not yet begun. Toggling between        > Z225-226 shows us that is when JFK's reflexive raising of his arms began at       Z226, the same frame JBC's reflexive flipping        > of his right arm upward began. You won't address any of these facts because       you know they are powerful evidence of the        > validity of the SBT. Instead you obfuscate by diverting to far less reliable       indicators of what happened.       > > Here's some more news for the two of you: your observations aren't       evidence of ANYTHING.       > What we observe is evidence and you refuse to address or even acknowledge       what the video evidence clearly shows.       > > They're opinions and nothing more.       > You won't even address the facts. If you deny what I have observed is       factual, tell us which frame JFK's arms start moving        > upward. Tell us which frame JBC's right arm starts moving upward. You won't       answer either question because you lack the        > guts to do so.              As I predicted, Giltardo refused to address these points or answer the       questions. It's not as if it was difficult to do so. It       is a virtual certainty, when Giltardo is confronted with facts that don't jibe       with his cherished beliefs or faced with difficult       questions, he will take the coward's way out. Even though he responded to this       post, he deleted the above paragraphs        because he lacked both the guts and the intellect to make a reasoned response.       He steadfastly refuses to acknowledge       that JFK's and JBC's arms started upward at the same frame nor can he offer a       plausible alternative explanation for why        that would happen. He doesn't even have the guts to deny that happened because       that would make him look foolish. Since       he had no answer, he simply avoided the issue. He took the coward's way out.               --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca