From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Wednesday, December 13, 2023 at 10:50:16 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:   
   > On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:10:45 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett    
   >  wrote:    
   >    
   > >On Wednesday, December 13, 2023 at 5:31:09?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > >> On Tuesday, December 12, 2023 at 6:04:51?PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   > >> < a big long autobiography that no one cares about >    
   > >>    
   > >> You say Z frame 226 shows Kennedy and Connally reacting to having been   
   hit by the same bullet and that shot was the second shot.    
   > >> You claim that the first shot was the one that missed.    
   > >> At what Z frame was the first shot fired ?    
   > >    
   > >If the Z-film had sound, we would be able to discern that for certain.   
   > That's provably a lie.   
      
     That is provably meaningless hot air.   
      
   > >Since it didn't, the best we can do is make educated    
   > >guesses as to when the missed shot was fired. Based on the camera jiggle   
   and the observable reactions of Connally and    
   > >Rosemary Willis, my educated guess is about Z151. Some have guessed   
   earlier. Some have guessed later. What we know    
   > >for sure is that all the guesses can't be right.   
   > That has much in common with all the different SBT's... they not only    
   > cannot all be right, it's probable that none of them are.   
      
     You can imagine as many as you like, there is only one SBT. Kennedy and   
   Connolly being struck by the same bullet.   
      
   > >Now, tell us why it is important to pinpoint when that first shot was fired.   
   > Nope.    
      
     Of course not, you`re a hypocrite.   
      
   >We're examining *YOUR* kooky worldview.   
      
     Were reasoning is used on information to draw conclusions?   
      
     As compared to ConspiracyWorld, where rocking horse people eat marshmallow   
   pies   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)