From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 12:03:05 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 8:10:04 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   >    
   > > While the CTs have widely divergent theories about who was behind the   
   assassination, none of them will tell us how it happened nor present any   
   evidence supporting their beliefs.   
   > Why should anyone waste their time explaining what happened to people whose   
   minds are already made up ?    
      
     To show you have something to offer?   
      
   > Time and time again, attempts have been made to show you that this case was   
   fraudulent.   
      
     So Corbett was correct, you have nothing to offer and can only bitch about   
   the case that was made.   
      
   > But all you do is make up excuses and argue against.    
   > You won't accept anything other than the official version.    
      
     You have nothing, that is the point.   
      
   > ( In your minds ) You already have the truth, why would you want to hear an   
   alternative scenario ?    
      
     To see if you have any reasonable or plausible to offer.   
      
   > Anytime someone posts a theory, you attack it and the poster, so no one   
   wants to tell you shit.    
      
     Do you not realize how lame this is? You spend all your time attacking the   
   official narrative, but cry that you don`t want to produce anything because it   
   will be attacked.   
       
   > Stop crying about Google not letting you flame people for free. Because in   
   the final analysis, that's all you people are here for.    
      
     Stop the pity party. Stop trying to play the victim card. You choose to put   
   your stupidity on display in public.    
      
   > You don't post any evidence.    
      
     All online. You cant put it together into a cohesive package explaining this   
   event, so what good does it do you?   
      
   >You don't cite any sources.    
      
    You are the source of your stupid ideas.   
      
   >You refuse to answer questions.    
      
    Why would we need to?   
      
   > But day after day, you come here and attack people. You call names like   
   bratty little 10 year olds.    
      
     If you want to be treated like an adult conduct yourself like one. You and   
   your buddy Ben are amazingly childish.   
      
   > The best you can do is to copy-and-paste info you get online without giving   
   the author any credit for their work.    
      
     Is this the best you can do for a complaint?   
       
   > I'm glad Google is shutting this down. When you leave the door open, whether   
   it's free access to newsgroups or an open southern border, you invite the    
   > most unscrupulous characters to contaminate the community. Like a fungus   
   that won't go away, you assholes have taken the liberty to contaminate a    
   > "conspiracy" newsgroup with your presence. Why ? You don't believe in   
   conspiracies.    
      
     You have nothing to offer, this post shows it.   
       
   > Because you're looking for trouble. You're the bullies of the internet and   
   nobody likes a bully.    
      
     Boo-hoo, poor Gil is picked on.    
       
   > And even if you pay the $100-200/year it's going to cost you for a   
   newsreader AND an NTTP server, there's no guarantee that your attacks will be   
   seen by your intended target.    
   > Unlike Google, many newsreaders now allow the "blocking" of certain posters.   
   If they can't see your post, you can't piss them off.   
      
     You could have created a private forum where you and your fellow crackpots   
   could jabber their crackpot shit among one another all along.   
      
   > Then what's the point ?    
      
     Yes, what is it? Are you going to bring Kennedy`s killers to justice, get   
   Oswald off the hook? What is the point?   
      
   > Face it, you're defeated. You'll have to get your "entertainment" from   
   another source.    
      
     It had about ran it`s course. There is nobody on your side to discuss ideas   
   with.   
       
   > Besides, you have YOUR truth, so have some class and walk off into the   
   sunset like a man.    
      
     You had every chance to make a case yourself like a man. Instead you bitch   
   about the men who actually could and did. Those that can, do, those that can`t   
   cry about those that can.   
      
   > Instead of a sobbing little baby who can't quite reach his bottle.   
      
     Ironic. Gil goes on a crying rant and projects his tears onto others.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)