Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 98,907 of 99,700    |
|    Bud to JE Corbett    |
|    Re: Who is going to stick around come Fe    |
|    17 Dec 23 04:32:19    |
      From: sirslick@fast.net              On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 7:25:01 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:       > On Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 8:10:57 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:        > > On Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 7:53:36 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:        > > > On Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 4:16:52 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:        > > > > On Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 8:22:24 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett       wrote:        > > > > > I doubt I will. Just not worth the time or expense of getting a new       newsreader.        > > > > Pretty sure I won`t. I`m an old dog, I don`t want to have to learn new       tricks.        > > > >        > > > > But there is mixed signals, if you hit "learn more" you`ll find...       "Starting on February 22, 2024..."        > > > >        > > > > So maybe an extra week in paradise.        > > > > > This group has already been reduced to maybe a dozen regular       contributors,        > > > > > about a half dozen on each side. If we lose half of them which is my       guess,        > > > > > the remaining contributors will be speaking to a very small       audience. What is        > > > > > our most prolific poster, Yellowpanties, going to do when he doesn't       have LN        > > > > > content to delete?        > > > > He has chosen to become meaningless background noise. Better for him       then actually attempting to engage in ideas.        > > Yes, he’s essentially reduced to spamming the website with the same       couple of responses because he doesn't want to actually discuss the evidence.       When we've gone toe-to-toe on the evidence, he lost every time. He’ll deny       it of course, and call me        a liar, but he’ll then spam the group some more and avoid discussing       whatever topic is under discussion in that particular thread.        > >        > > By his actions you shall know him.        > >        > > But when you have no evidence, what recourse do you have? Ben is reduced       to doing what he does because he has no evidence.        > > > >        > > > > There is really nobody here to discuss things with anyway, there is       Ben the Troll, Gil the Martyr and assorted crackpots.        > > > > > The McAdams group died a sudden death when its sole moderator passed        > > > > > away taking the keys to the group with him. This one will probably       die a slow        > > > > > death.        > > > > It was dead for about a year here once, I would check in and there       would be little to no activity. I don`t know what brought it back to some       semblance of activity.        > > > > > I remember once coming across a newsgroup that interested me and I       made        > > > > > a long and thoughtful response to something somebody else had       written.        > > > > > After posting it, I discovered it was the first post made to that       group in seven        > > > > > years. I had come across a Usenet ghost town. I wouldn't be       surprised if that        > > > > > becomes the fate of this group, not that 99.99+% of the country will       give a        > > > > > shit or even know about it.        > > > > It does appear that we will be able to read the archives using google.       We can relive old glory.        > > > We could decide whether the conspiracy hobbyists have become more or       less stupid over the years.        > > > >        > > > > Ben had a conspiracy website, maybe we can go there.        > > > Maybe he has it set up for auto delete.        > > He found reasons to lock out everyone he disagreed with. I decided it       would not be worth my while to post there, as he would call me a liar and lock       me out in short order.       > I found it much simpler just to ignore his posts as I have done since early       last summer. He's a one trick pony. When he        > comes across an argument he can't respond to, which is most arguments he       comes across, he simply labels it a        > logical fallacy and deletes it. Why bother even responding to him. Come       February, most people won't. What's he going        > to do then?               Claim everyone ran away from him, of course. Declare himself the winner.               He is a sad case.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca