Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 98,911 of 99,700    |
|    NoTrueFlags Here to Donald Willis    |
|    Re: How "Braden"/Florer got on the polic    |
|    17 Dec 23 09:20:16    |
      From: 19efppp@mail.com              On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 11:55:07 AM UTC-5, Donald Willis wrote:       > On Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 10:56:12 PM UTC-8, NoTrueFlags Here       wrote:        > > On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 12:12:38 AM UTC-5, Donald Willis wrote:        > > > How "Braden"/Florer got on the police airwaves        > > >        > > > It all started with Insp. Sawyer, Sgt. Gerald Hill, Patrolman James       Valentine, and Officer Ira Trantham, at the front of the TSBD. "Jerry Hill and       [Trantham] went inside. Hill continued upstairs and an officer ap[proached him       with a prisoner.        Advised this subject had been observed 'acting suspiciously' on the third       floor without a reasonable explanantion for being up there... At the front       doorway, Sawyer was apprised of this development" and had Trantham take the       suspect to the sheriff's.--       Trantham's HSCA interview.        > > >        > > > "Shortly after, a DPD officer brought a boy in a sport coat up and said,       'Here is the man that had done the shooting'... Insp. Sawyer was informed of       this..."--Chief Criminal Deputy Allan Sweatt, Investigation Report 11/23/63.        > > >        > > > Quite a jump--from "acting suspiciously" to "the man that had done the       shooting". Why was the "prisoner" thought to be the man who shot Kennedy? The       man, as far as we know, had no weapon or bullets on him. Did he try to run?       Did he confess? The "       Braden"/Florer end of this puzzle will remain a puzzle. But, at the other       end...        > > >        > > > The Trantham interview corrects Sgt. Hill, who testified he went into       the building with Sawyer. The latter apparently went in a little later. How do       I know that he didn't go in earlier? Because, at 1pm, DPD Captain Talbert       radios, "I think that 5        and 9 (Lumpkin & Sawyer) both are still in the building." (CE 1974 p43) By       1:08, Sawyer seems to be out front again--Sgt. Harkness radios that       information & persons should be brought to Sawyer. (CE 1974 p50) And at 1:12,       Sawyer radios that hulls were        found on the "3rd floor".        > > >        > > > The Braden/Florer puzzle helps clear up the 1:12 puzzle. Sawyer has       heard that a man has been arrested, on the 3rd floor, for shooting. About       1:10, Sgt. Hill brings Sawyer up-to-date. He says that shells and scraps of       chicken have been found.        Whether or not Hill indicated the number of a floor for this find, we don't       know. But Sawyer ties Hill's information to the earlier 3rd-floor information       and radios that the shells were found on the "3rd floor". The old mystery       solved...        > > >        > > > But there was a secondary mystery. Sawyer told reporters that day that       shells and remains of fried chicken were found on the *fifth* floor. Where did       he get *that*? Educated guess: Chief Deputy Sheriff Allan Sweatt reported that       weekend that fellow        deputy Luke Mooney yelled out the "5th floor window" that "spent cartridge       cases" had been found there. Sawyer was apparently inside when Mooney cried       out and did not hear him. But I think that Sweatt must have heard Sawyer's       broadcast and went over to        tell him about the "fifth floor window". Hence, the adjusted story told to       reporters... Another mystery solved?        > > >        > > > dcw        > > You'll probably do better not to drop my "name" over there at the Ed Farm.       I think don't like me. I don't mind, though, if you want to.       > Yes, I was wondering why you don't post there...       Well, nobody really wants to discuss anything. We all pontificate. That's why       I like making videos, a better medium for the pontiff. I get ideas from       looking at posts, but there's no discussion there. Almost everybody is a       propagandist. A few people        discuss, but the majority are not useful for discussion.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca