From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Tuesday, December 19, 2023 at 10:30:23 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:   
   > On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 05:42:54 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett    
   >  wrote:    
   >    
   > >On Tuesday, December 19, 2023 at 7:21:32?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > >> On Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 3:03:47?PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:    
   > >>> To convince them why their minds shouldn't be made up. But since you   
   can't do that, why should anyone change their minds?    
   > >> Bullshit. Don't make it sound like you're open minded. You're not.    
   > >> In fact, this very thread started by you is nothing more than another   
   flame job directed at the WC critics.    
   > >> That's all you people are doing now that you see the end of free posting   
   in sight.    
   > >> Every one of your posts is an attack on either me, Ben or the critical   
   community in general.    
   > >> Instead of going out of here in class, you people are going out proving   
   to the world what pieces of shit you really are.    
   > >> > Come February 15, instead of preaching to 12 people, you'll be   
   preaching to 2.    
   > >> One difference is that after February 15th, you will no longer be able to   
   post your silly comments and insults.    
   > >> But you WILL be able to read posts made through other servers until   
   February 22nd. Then no more Google usenet.    
   > >> Google will no longer provide support for either new posting or reading   
   posts after February 22nd.    
   > >>    
   > >> It'll be fun posting between February 15th and the 22nd, knowing that   
   you're reading our posts and not able to respond.    
   > >> It'll be fun knowing how much it's killing you to lose that "priviledge".    
   > >> But don't worry, if you DO change your mind and decide to "pay to play",   
   we'll just killfilter you, rendering your insults worthless.    
   > >> Face it, the Golden Era for trolls is over.    
   > >>    
   > >> Do you really think that Google is the only newsreader out there ?    
   > >> Do you really think that Google is the only source of readers ?    
   > >> ROFLMAO.    
   > >>    
   > >> Another difference is that Ben and I will continue to post evidence   
   critical to the Warren Commission's findings which will be seen by a potential   
   world wide audience.    
   > >> Anyone in the world who has a newsreader ( free or pay ) and is   
   subscribed to this newsgroup will see our posts.    
   > >> But they won't see yours.    
   > >>    
   > >>> Have fun.    
   > >>    
   > >> We intend to.    
   > >    
   > >Google is going haywire right now so I am bottom posting.    
   > >    
   > > I am not open minded about the possibility of Oswald's innocence.    
   > > The time for that expired a long time ago. I would be open minded    
   > > about a conspiracy if I was ever presented any credible evidence of one.   
   > Credible evidence is posted all the time. Some of which was known on    
   > 11/22/63... such as the entry wound in JFK's throat,   
      
     You refuse to show it was a entry.   
      
   > and the dozens of    
   > witnesses to shots coming from the GK.    
      
     Some witnesses indicated echoes.   
       
   > You simply deny that it's credible - but most of America disagrees    
   > with you.    
      
     Does most of America feel the z-film was altered, stupid? They disagree with   
   you.    
       
   > I was forced to delete the rest of your rant, since it was nothing but    
   > logical fallacies.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)