From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Tuesday, December 19, 2023 at 10:50:04 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:   
   > "No credible evidence..."    
   >    
   > I'd be a rich man if I had a nickel for everytime a believer posted    
   > that phrase...    
   >    
   > It is, of course, a meaningless phrase... believers like Corbutt    
   > cannot support it by any citation to ANYTHING... so all they're really    
   > saying is that they don't believe the evidence.    
      
     Your mangling of the concept is meaningless.   
       
   > That is, of course, EXACTLY the problem - they believe a bunch of    
   > lawyers, untrained in any investigative procedures, to tell us what    
   > happened.    
      
     You will never support that lawyers are untrained in investigative   
   procedures.   
      
     Of course you never support any of your hot air.   
       
   > Never mind that these lawyers flat LIED about their own collected    
   > testimony from eyewitnesses... because believers will never    
   > acknowledge this fact.    
      
     You refuse to establish this as fact.   
       
   > Never mind that the average person finds dozens of witnesses who    
   > pointed to the GK "credible" - that means nothing to believers. It's    
   > not "credible" to "them.*    
      
     You never support the idea that where people *thought* the sound of the   
   shots came from rises to the level of credible evidence.   
      
     Of course, you never support anything you say.   
       
   > It's good to see Corbutt finally throwing in the towel, and running    
   > away for good. One less liar to refute on a daily basis.   
      
     You have your own little world going on.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)