From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 7:01:35 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Tuesday, December 19, 2023 at 3:27:53 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:    
   > > You have your own little world going on.   
   > But his is not a world where all the cops are honest.    
   > Where cops don't lie under oath.    
      
     We live in a world where lone nuts take a gun and go out into the world to   
   inflict violence. Using your logic this means Oswald is guilty.   
      
   > Where prosecutory misconduct is OK.   
      
     Who said there was any in this case? You? Other crackpots?   
       
   > Where the violation of one's Constitutional rights is ok.    
      
      Who said there was any in this case? You? Other crackpots?   
      
   > His is not a world where witnesses are harassed and threatened and that's   
   OK.    
      
     What exactly were the threats?   
      
   > His is not a world where evidence is handled in a most haphazard way and   
   that's OK.    
      
     You are the one that finds the conviction rate to be suspicious, apparently   
   they know more about how to handle evidence than you do.   
      
   > His is not a world where witnesses are ignored and authorities are ordered   
   not to interview them and that's OK.    
      
     Hundreds of conspiracy books, nobody tracks them down to see what they had   
   to say?   
      
   > His is not a world where a suspect can be completely searched TWICE by   
   police and still have bullet cartridges in his pocket.    
      
     Who said he was searched twice? You?   
       
   > His is not a world where even though witnesses could not identify the items   
   in evidence as the items they found, the items in evidence are accepted as the   
   items they found.    
      
     You refuse to show how it would be possible for the witnesses to make a   
   positive identification of the evidence.   
      
   > His is not a world where even though the shells at the murder scene did not   
   match the bullets from the officer's body, those shells contained the bullets.    
      
     You refuse to show how this is a problem. Do police always find every shell   
   and every spent bullet in every shooting?   
      
   > His is not a world where authorities are so stupid that they can't tell one   
   rifle from another, or a .38 special from a .38 automatic even though they're   
   all clearly marked.    
      
     You refuse to show they read the markings on the items.   
      
   > His is not a world where authorities are so stupid they can't tell a white   
   jacket from a "tannish grey" one.    
      
     Looks white to me in the film taken at the time it was found. Looks   
   different in different light. Just like Oswald`s hair.   
      
   > His is not a world where a witness' choice of someone who she never saw   
   before can be considered, "a positive identification".    
      
     You choose to exploit testimony because you have no interest in the truth.   
       
   > His is not a world of magic bullet paths or a moving back wound.    
      
     Conspiracy crackpot constructs.   
      
   > His is not a world where a lack of a bullet track is proof of a transiting   
   bullet.    
      
     Who said it was?   
      
   > His is not a world where autopsists can determine whether a bullet wound is   
   a wound of entry or a wound of exit without having ever seen it.    
      
     They can determine the path the bullet took and determine where it exited.   
       
   > No, that's YOUR "own little world" and that of your Lone Nut allies and you   
   are happy in it,   
      
     I`m fine with reality. You, not so much.   
      
   > along with your Sugar Plum Fairy followers like Christine Strimbu and BT   
   George.    
   > And I'm happy for you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)